I thought, once you built a WALL that it is your NEW boundary.
If you are a solicitor I will accept that statement but in my experience from carrying out surveys in the past the established boundary cant simply be moved because someone wants to put up a fence or wall. The other party to a shared boundary cant dictate terms so long as the fence/wall is on the correct side of the boundary line by even 1 inch. That of course is subject to the height which is not an issue in this instanceyou erect this a clear 18" away from hers. This is the minimum distance required in law
Regardless of your relationship with your neighbour there should be no boundary issues if the deeds of your property clearly delineate your site. Check with your solicitor if in any doubt.don't want any boundry issues when it comes to resale.
Regardless of your relationship with your neighbour there should be no boundary issues if the deeds of your property clearly delineate your site. Check with your solicitor if in any doubt.
But that is precisely what the maps with the deeds should clarify. If there is any doubt then you should get it sorted officially with your solicitor.It wasn't clear where the exact line was?
But that is precisely what the maps with the deeds should clarify. If there is any doubt then you should get it sorted officially with your solicitor.
If the line is clear on the map then I don't understand why there would be any confusion about where it is in the actual garden. What I meant was clarifying with your solicitor that the boundary of the property is clear and that this matches the existing or new fences etc. if there is any doubt about any of this.Just to clarify, what I meant was that the physical line on our garden we weren't sure about, on the map it was very clear.
We are erecting the fence where the physical line on map is drawn.
We have agreed this with surveyor and neighbour.
Is that what you meant?
Can you provide a link to substantiate this claim as its news to meIf a householder erects a structure adjacent to a neighbour's boundary fence there is a requirement to leave room (18" is the specified distance) to facilitate maintenance
The OP did not like the appearance of the boundary fence the neighbour had erected. Several respondents suggested taking the neighbour's fence down. As far as I understood this exchange there was never any dispute about the location of the neighbour's fence which we were told 'was the boundary' between the properties.
Several respondents suggested taking the neighbour's fence down (a criminal act). A number of further replies suggested the OP put another fence - right up against the neighbours. If a householder erects a structure adjacent to a neighbour's boundary fence there is a requirement to leave room (18" is the specified distance) to facilitate maintenance (i.e. you cannot build anything 'up against' a neighbour's land or property.) All these matters can be checked out by a telephone call or visit to the local Council offices.
The OP did not in any way imply a dispute about misappropriation of a few inches of anothers garden or a change in location of the offending fence. This was introduced by respondents.
The OP did not like the appearance of the boundary fence the neighbour had erected. Several respondents suggested taking the neighbour's fence down.
Marie I would be much obliged if you could provide a link to this information as it sounds new to me. I cant understand why anyone would want to leave 18 inches of their land to their neighbour to facilitate maintenance of their boundary fencing. If this was the case then there would be an 18 inch gap between every neighbouring garden in the country?? Or am i really missing something here. I think you have confused the issue with planning and extensions etc rather than boundary fencing/walls.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?