Thanks jpd.
I think I could have worded my post better, and will edit it to make it clearer for future responses.
I absolutely trust that my solicitor is working in my best interest and have no doubt that what he’s telling me is true.
I guess what I’m trying to say is that I don’t understand why contracts were issued without the boundary issue being resolved by the vendors as, ultimately, they’re the only ones who can remedy this.
They were upfront about the issue when it was discovered and I had assumed that they were having it rectified and what my solicitor would receive would reflect boundaries based on what was listed on the sales ad, and shown to us when we viewed the house. If they wanted to be duplicitous, surely they wouldn’t have told me in the first place?