When I look at the Urban Place Map scale 1:1000 that was submitted with a planning application for an extension on the existing house on the site, the Land Ownership outline runs right on top of the wall separating our two properties.
you may want to investigate with a local archaeologist before you even break ground in the vicinity of this 'ambiguous boundary' in light of this your statement aboveIn relation to the interesting post from Guns 'n Roses, the neighbours did mention that there was originally an ancient wall running along the line where they state the boundary is (not there now), but if as is suggested below the property can be 1.8m further than this to allow for upkeep of the wall. If the wall is removed, the boundary becomes undefined.......
Geri
The wall at the bottom of our garden separates our property from our neighbours back garden which backs onto ours.
if you were to go ahead with the proposed building and ignore the neighbours boundary issue, this 'ancient wall' issue wouldn't come to the attention of the relevant authorities would it?think I'll leave the friendly neighbourhood archaeologist out of it for now - we have enough problems
if you were to go ahead with the proposed building and ignore the neighbours boundary issue, this 'ancient wall' issue wouldn't come to the attention of the relevant authorities would it?
I got the land registry map today from the solicitor. The black hatch marking showing our property is not right up to the separating wall, but is right along side it with.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?