Wasn't that one of the reasons for the Blood Tribunal, the purchase of blood from dubious donors?
No, there was no purchase of blood from dubious donors. That is very very wrong. The donors in question did nohing wrong.
Here is my recollection. I am open to correction on the details.
Human Immunoglobulin Anti-D is a product produced from blood donations. It is used to medically treat women after birth in certain medical circumstances.
The products used in Ireland were made from donated blood from a small number of donors. The blood donors involved donated their blood voluntarily and freely.
There was no test for Hep-C, so the donated blood could not have been tested for it. A number of years later, some of the donors contracted hepatitis Symptoms, but did not test positive for any of the known types of Hepatitis. It subsequently transpired that they had Hep-C.
Even though it was known to the authoritites that the donors had Hep symptoms and may have Hepatitis, it was decided to continue to us the products created from their donations, and many women contracted Hep-C as a result.
Good medical practise would have been to dump all the products and make more from different original donations.