Our company has begun exploring if a BIK tax liability applies to private use of company mobile phones. To this end, those with the 'perk' are being asked to review monthly bills to determine the level of private use.
I don't want to get into the should v. should not debate here. I'm more interested in the scientific interpretation of the new BIK legislation as it may apply to mobile phones.
One obvious question that comes to mind is that if it is concluded that a BIK tax liability does indeed apply, why would it not apply to private use of the phone on my desk, private use of email access, web access etc. A general answer I expect is that there are lots of things for which a private benefit arises (parking, free coffee, etc.) but the cost/logistics of enforcing the tax liability in most cases makes it impractical (I understand this played a part in the reversal of the planned liability for private use of commercial vehicles).
Anyway, does anyone see, or have experience of this BIK liability being applied to mobile phone use? It looks like the planned approach here is to not pay the tax liability, but rather to ensure the liability does not arise by charging everyone for the level of private use.