Hello,
I am currently looking to get a 100 % mortgage. There are two of us, our combined salaries come to around 90K. I'm looking to buy around the 350,000 mark and I want a 35 year tracker loan. I ckecked most of the 100% lenders either in person or through their webpages and I think permanent tsb probably suits me best, although I need to research a bit more. What I am wondering is, if I went to a broker, could I expect to get a better deal through them in terms of for example loantime (for example AIB only does 30 year lones, could a broker negotiate 35 years) or interest rate or manage to get a tracker rate that a 100% mortgage taker usually couldn't avail of?
I know that usually you can get more money using a broker, but that is not an issue I have, as all the banks would give me more than I want to spend.
So unless a broker could get me a better interest rate or better loan terms as such, there wouldn't be much point I don't think.
What do you all think?
I am currently looking to get a 100 % mortgage. There are two of us, our combined salaries come to around 90K. I'm looking to buy around the 350,000 mark and I want a 35 year tracker loan. I ckecked most of the 100% lenders either in person or through their webpages and I think permanent tsb probably suits me best, although I need to research a bit more. What I am wondering is, if I went to a broker, could I expect to get a better deal through them in terms of for example loantime (for example AIB only does 30 year lones, could a broker negotiate 35 years) or interest rate or manage to get a tracker rate that a 100% mortgage taker usually couldn't avail of?
I know that usually you can get more money using a broker, but that is not an issue I have, as all the banks would give me more than I want to spend.
So unless a broker could get me a better interest rate or better loan terms as such, there wouldn't be much point I don't think.
What do you all think?