Berkshire Hathaway as an alternative to an ETF?

ClubMan

Registered User
Messages
52,098
Some index tracking ETFs and unit linked funds do what you're talking about but the charges and taxation are much worse compared to direct equity investments. @Brendan Burgess has already explained why direct equity investment might be a better idea in this case. If you're worried about investing in one or two shares then maybe consider large diversified conglomerates like Berkshire Hathaway and similar companies. For example, if you invest in BH then this is the sort of thing that you get:

1738449383536.png
Other comparable conglomerate companies would offer similar asset allocation diversification.
 

Attachments

  • download.png
    download.png
    9.3 KB · Views: 26
Last edited:
Very interesting.

So you have 39% of your investments in unquoted companies such as insurance companies and railroads.
29% in cash waiting to pounce on the next investment opportunity
9% in Apple
4% in Bank of America
4% in Amex
3% in Coca Cola
12% in other quoted shares
 
Just for context, my post above was split out from this thread:
Similar information on BH's asset holdings is available here:
Also, this issue has cropped up before, e.g.:
 
Last edited:
Are you able to do a comparison between the tax of Berkshire versus a ETF?
In very simple terms it's CGT @ 33% (less allowances/previously incurred losses) versus exit/8 yearly deemed disposal tax @ 41% (for ETFs subject to that tax treatment).
 
Hello,

What premium do you think is built into the value of BH, to reflect Warren Buffet's involvement?

Or, to put it another way, how much do you think the value of BH will drop, if and when the Sage passes away?

I really rate the man btw, so don't wish him ill, but he's gotta be getting close to the finish line, at this stage and I think some of the loyal following who have invested in him, may exit, if he leaves us, or investors won't value BH at such a premium, without him.
 
Price-to-book value is about 1.6 currently, so a 40%-odd downside compared to just owning the stocks/cash in the exact same proportions yourself. Given their cash pile and the elevated price of stocks, if you believe stocks are due a correction and that BH even without Buffett would still pick some winners from the carnage, it’s not a bad bet that they’ll bounce back from the inevitable sad news day.

I think the bigger bet is not so much whether there’s a sustained post-Buffett BH sell-off but rather whether there’s an overall market sell-off sooner rather than later.
 
Price-to-book value is about 1.6 currently, so a 40%-odd downside compared to just owning the stocks/cash in the exact same proportions yourself
Stocks, cash, and the core BH businesses? Or just the first two?
 
What premium do you think is built into the value of BH, to reflect Warren Buffet's involvement?
The WB premium could actually be a deficit...
 
Having any sizeable proportion of your wealth in one stock is taking on a humongous risk.

Id prefer the increased diversification that’s available via the gross roll up regime rather than invest in individual shares. If you’re already paying tax at the 52% rate then gross roll up isn’t so bad.
 

but that was back in 2017 when Berkshire stock was trading at a much smaller premium and when Buffet I think was using cash to buy back Berkshire stock because he then considered buy backs to be best use of cash , he ain't doing that now though he is just leaving it all in cash, he has been bearish for ages aswell even back then he thought stocks (US ) were expensive. He also got covid very wrong selling out of airlines and oil companies during the covid crash at a loss and missing out on huge rebound.

The main issue for international investors is the exposure to US markets and US dollar, very little international, he is really just focussed on his US client base and the oul codgers that go to his AGMs I think, once their holdings in US dollar terms don't have a big fall he is happy which explains his huge holdings in cash and risk adversion, surely a younger Buffett would have been making bigger forays into international markets where the value is .
 
Isn't this thread at odds with the posting guidelines?


 
Last edited:
Isn't this thread at odds with the posting guidelines?
If you think it is then you should use the "Report" facility to flag it to the moderators.
Note that neither my first post (split from another thread by @Brendan Burgess) nor any of my subsequent posts involve speculation about future performance of BH.
I'm merely discussing technical issues regarding its asset allocation mix which is allowed under the posting guidelines as far as I'm aware.
 
I'd have thought that in the short term at least,the demise of Buffett would see a significant pullback, Berkshire Hathaway is in many ways a bet on Apple