Afraid not. It is you the shareholders who appoint the directors.
Afraid not. It is you the shareholders who appoint the directors. It is you the shareholders who gets the benefit of the company. You have signed contracts with the benefit of legal advice stating that you will pay whatever contributions are due. Now it is time to pay up. If you feel the directors have acted recklessly take a case. If you feel the solicitor should have advised you better speak to the law society. If you feel the law is wrong speak to your TD and ask for it to be changed. If you feel you can fix it hold an EGM and get new directors appointed (I wish you luck!!!!).
We never appointed any directors. The builder has retained one unit so still controls the management company. The company is insolvent but if we report this our investments could become worthless. Anyone volunteering to be a director of this company would be crazy but how else can we do something?
The builders may currently have effective management control, but the shareholders appoint the directors. The directors in turn control the management of the company. I'd advise you to find out what mechanisms are there to enable new directors to be apointed. If the appointment of new directors is in someway blocked to you then the solicitor who acted for you on purchase of the appartment should probably be taken out and shot (as you then own something you can be blocked from controlling in any way).
Also, how could the fact the company being insolvent make your investments (by which I presume you mean the properties themselves) worthless? The liability of the company is limited, hence the name.
Anyone volunteering would certainly be faced with a lot of time, trouble and grief sorting out the mess, but as I pointed out before will not be personally liable for anything unless they act improperly. If one or more of the people who are currently directly affected by the problems aren't prepared to do this, then who else would you suggest this might be?
Until the last unit in the complex is sold the builder controls 51% of the management company so he calls the shots....
If a management company folds, apartments cannot be sold so they are in effect worthless.
If you become a director of a company which is insolvent and continue to trade you are immediately guilty of reckless trading and could face disqualification and other such delightful sanctions.
The Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement (www.odce.ie) wishes to clarify the statement in Post #13 above that “[the ODCE’s role] does not extend to dealing with complaints from the public about individual [management] companies.
I know people who have contacted the ODCE to report companies who have breached company law and diddled people in the process. The ODCE have told them that their role does not extend to dealing with complaints from the public about individual companies.
There's a big difference between a dispute over an invoice and having proof a company is insolvent. If there was proof of insolvency (and being owed money doesn't prove this) I would be surprised if the ODCE didn't take action. As they said though, they're not a debt collection agency.
I also don't see anything wrong about them asking for written statements. In fact, anything that has potential to end up in the courts (as a winding up of company for example) would need this. The fact that the complainant wouldn't make such a written complaint is another reason why the ODCE probably sees no reason to act.
I'd imagine the Garda or Revenue would act in exactly the same way when faced with a civil dispute.
Unless there's more than an unpaid invoice, the best advice would be to get a solicitor onto it. I was in a similar situation last year (with a well known company as it happens). After initially ignoring legal proceedings they eventually paid up.
Unfortunately I cannot do so as the specific information in question was divulged to me by a client in the course of my work and there may be a possibility of breaking ethical/confidentiality codes if I divulge these specifics here.Maybe if you elaborated on the nature of the breaches what you say would make more sense.
I doubt these documents state explicitley "Hands up, we're breaking the law".
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?