This kind of thinking is dangerous, most accidents occur close to home, and you dont need to be driving a maserati around a race track for wet road braking distances to be of the utmost importance. The fact that you were happy to leave a set of tyres on your car for 10 years speaks to your risk assessment imo.I'm driving a Dacia Sandero to and from the school, around town, and the odd time on the motorway. Not a Maserati on the Nurburgring. I comfortable that my risk assessment is adequate. But, if you're still worried, just steer clear of the blue Sandero on the cheap tyres driven by the grumpy old sod around Dublin (mostly).
I've always suspected this too but I've always spent that 10%-15% extra on a premium brand as I didn't want to take the risk.Perhaps cheaper tyres wear quicker (and even then, as effective commodities, is that actually the case?) but I find it difficult to believe that they're necessarily somehow more dangerous as some people would lead one to believe. I suspect that there's a significant element of consumerism, brand loyalty/tax, and buyer's remorse/cognitive dissonance at play here.
you can get reviews of most tyres online with wet and dry braking tests etc,I've always suspected this too but I've always spent that 10%-15% extra on a premium brand as I didn't want to take the risk.
It would be nice to hear an informed opinion on it.
As, presumably, does the fact that I never had one accident in that time either?The fact that you were happy to leave a set of tyres on your car for 10 years speaks to your risk assessment imo.
I never mentioned any other brand.For what its worth Kumho are genuinely mid range and id be more comfortable with them than whatever the other ones you mentioned are.
Given the quality of tyres available here for 90-100 a corner (Michelin, Goodyear, Bridgestone) I wouldn't be going within a mile of Davanti.
The compromise you make with these budget brands is braking distance in most cases, not something I'd recommend.
Tyre fitters are incentivised to sell this stuff, they will give you some guff about how they are rebadged (insert proper tyre brand here) and just as good.
The cheapest tyre on Oponeo for 185/65/15 is a Firemax at €51 with a C B rating
The most expensive is a Goodyear ( Efficientgrip Performance) at €129 with a C C rating, so the wet grip performance is worse with the Goodyear.
FWIW no tyre fitter has ever recommended any supplier or brand to me but a supplier and fitter has, and they are incentivised to sell the dearer tyre !
It can be the other way round. Wear is usually a factor of tyre compound hardness. The harder they are, the longer they last, but then the harder compounds will offer less grip. Think Formula 1 and the performance impact of the different compounds they use.Perhaps cheaper tyres wear quicker (and even then, as effective commodities, is that actually the case?)
Id suggest you take a look at the links below. 7 metres longer braking distance 80-0km/h in the wet.
Firemax FM601
Will the Firemax FM601 suit your car? Find the best tyre for your car read 8 reviews for Firemax FM601 and compare to other Economy Comfort tyreswww.tyrereviews.com
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
Will the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance suit your car? Find the best tyre for your car read 250 reviews for Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance and compare to other Premium Comfort tyreswww.tyrereviews.com
good question, but the reality is budget tyres tend to be budget for a reason, labeling regardless.The question is why does the EU labeling system not reflect this and ,if it doesn't, what's the point of it ?
It does, all are rated for wet grip. and braking distance from 80km/h is tested to come up with that rating.The question is why does the EU labeling system not reflect this and ,if it doesn't, what's the point of it ?
Keeping well behind the car in front is not as safe as you think it is when your cheap tyres need 8 metres longer than a decent set to stop.The tyres are not the most important safety feature in a car. The driver is.
Drive with respect to road conditions and visibility of the road in front, at or below the speed limit and keep well behind the car in front. Don't veer across continuos white lines and anticipate what is happening in front of you and the cheapest EU compliant tyres are entirely safe.
Who mentioned the nct? If you think 8 metres difference in stopping distance (at the same speed) is inconsequential then there isnt much point continuing a discussion.No car has ever failed it's NCT because it's owner bought the cheapest EU compliant tyres. It's not a safety issue. The main causes of longer stopping distance are speed and driver reaction time.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?