Agree? Sure! Arguably some charities are probably more deserving than others. 'packer free' checkouts - sure!
And nothing worse than a bad packer (typical profile - teenage male, who last went to supermarket when he was five years old and doesn't know that heavy things go at the bottom of the bag)
collecting for an organised charity. .... astounded to be told it was for a trip to Amsterdam for the boy [sic] scouts....wouldn't have contributed if she'd known in advance it was for something like that
You got it in one! Went to the supermarket last year. The local football team were packing the bags to raise money for a trip abroad.
Surely it's better to see these youngsters "earning" some of the funding needed for a trip/equipment etc., rather than just expect it to be there. They will appreciate it much more when they have had to do something to contribute to it.
I also think there should be several 'packer free' checkouts for people who'd prefer to pack there own bags but feel embarassed to say 'no' to these eager young people.
Finally when you get to these tills, you are not really given a choice of whether you really want to give to this charities/organisations but are socially embarassed if you do not support them.
SNAP !
I had the same experience in Superquinn some years ago. I'd happily chuck them a euro or two for them to not pack my bag.
I agree. There must be some very sensitive poor souls out there that they get "socially embarrassed" at saying no in such circumstances!Socially embarreassed?
Just say no, the kids don't mind. Or just have a chat with them, they're usually good for a laugh.
Surely it's better to see these youngsters "earning" some of the funding needed for a trip/equipment etc., rather than just expect it to be there. They will appreciate it much more when they have had to do something to contribute to it.
A friend of mine, whose teenagedaughter was involved in bagpacking to raise funds for herself and her fellow guides to go to Switzerland, admitted that they advised the kids not to say out straight what it was for as it would sound bad!
As an estate agent perhaps?enterprising girl - she will go far!
They certainly should have been in uniform - am shocked that any scout leader allowed them to participate out of uniform.Maybe if the scouts had worn their uniform it would have looked better.
From our perspective, we raise funds for the group - what the money is finally spent on depends on what the priorities are at the time....they advised the kids not to say out straight what it was for ..
there are other organisations who have other avenues of collecting moneys who seem to be constantly in the "bagging industry" e.g. GAA
Many Scout groups also fundraise for other charities as well as their own.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?