Confused28
Registered User
- Messages
- 26
Your AVCs will be subject to the rules of your occupational pension. So if that if 1.5 times final salary you will be limited in how much extra tax free is available from your AVCs.
There are a few different revenue allowable rules for calculating maximum tax free lump sum. It's not strictly based on your final year's salary.
The calculation method used by your occupational scheme probably won't result in the revenue maximum amount.
If you have overtime or bonus payments you could gain some extra tax free lump sum from your AVCs.
Any further lump sum taken from your AVCs would be taxed at your marginal rate.
Very helpful. Thanks again.Your AVCs will be subject to the rules of your occupational pension. So if that if 1.5 times final salary you will be limited in how much extra tax free is available from your AVCs.
There are a few different revenue allowable rules for calculating maximum tax free lump sum. It's not strictly based on your final year's salary.
The calculation method used by your occupational scheme probably won't result in the revenue maximum amount.
If you have overtime or bonus payments you could gain some extra tax free lump sum from your AVCs.
Any further lump sum taken from your AVCs would be taxed at your marginal rate.
I think this is inaccurate.At retirement you can have a pension of 2/3rds final salary + an ARF or Annuity funded from your AVCs.
I think this is inaccurate.
For a DB pension the maximum pension fund allowed by Revenue is to the equivalent of 2/3 of pensionable salary + allowances. The 2/3 limit is inclusive of AVCs. For the public service this 2/3 limit was given effect by a "full" pension of 0.5 of pensionable salary (and pensionable allowances), plus a lump sum of 1.5 pensionable salary, plus a survivor pension of 0.5 of the retiree's pension. There is still a small bit of space for leeway (eg, allowances which are not pensionable and some other variables such as a larger survivor pension)) but not a vast amount. So generally Class D public servants who have (or will have) full 40 years service have little scope for AVCs. Revenue has a formula for capitalizing these pension components and any other variables to maintain the overall 2/3 limit.
The situation is different for public servants who pay Class A PRSI (as all post-1995 entrants do). For them a full 40 year pension is 0.5 pensionable salary minus the State Pension (which is paid separately). Revenue do not take the State Pension component into account when calculating the 2/3 of salary limit. So even with 40 years of service these public servants have scope for substantial AVC funding. Of course the potential drawback is that any drawdowns are subject to USC and tax - which might be at the top 40% level. And highly paid PSs need to be careful not to get caught by the Standard Fund Threshold - currently €2m but increasing to €2.8m by 2029.
I'm not sure but don't think @Confused28 indicated whether he is a public servant and, if so, whether he is Class D or Class A.
If you are in a DB scheme, the max overall pension you can get (inclusive of any AVC pot) is 2/3rds Final Salary (inclusive of the Retirement Lump Sum) plus a Spouses Pension on your death in retirement of 100% of your pension plus indexation up to a max of CPI.
So depending of your DB benefits, service etc, you need to make sure any AVC'S will not lead to overfunding. So you should consult with your scheme advisors to ensure you aren't likely to overfund.
I think this is inaccurate.
Hello all.
Very informative responses, thank you.
Apologies for lack of information and mixing up some terms.
I am in the public sector, Class A PRSI. Post 1995, pre 2004
This is really confusing .Post in thread 'AVC Limit to aim for'
AVC Limit to aim for
Im 36 and have DB pension plan which including current state pension would give me approx 50k a year when retired, this will go up as time goes on as its career average pension. I max out my avcs of 20% and my employer contributes 3%. Will have near 100k in that by end of the year. Have...www.askaboutmoney.com
It is allowable to make AVCs to fund for a surviving spouses pension up to the rmaximim revenue allowable limit.
This is 100% of the employees pension.
The maximum surviving spouses pension in the Public Sector is 50% of the employees pension.
These AVCs can then be used to buy an ARF, or an Annuity or can be taken as a taxable lump sum at retirement.
I worked in Public Sector class D for almost 39 years.
I currently have almost full PS pension + ARF drawdowns which take my overall retirement earnings way above 40/80ths of my final salary.
This is allowable despite what certain other posters may state.
An extra bonus in having my allowable ARF was the ability to gain many years of class S Prsi contributions, which have allowed me to qualify for 180.70 euro per week Contributory Pension.
I don’t doubt what you say, BUT:I am living proof that this is possible.
I have my Public Sector pension since 2018.
My ARF started at the same time and all funds in my ARF were from AVCs related to my Public Sector income.
I had an ongoing dispute regarding my Public Sector pension which necessitated a full review of my AVCs at retirement age.
This review proved that I was not overfunded.
At retirement, after taking all possible tax free lump sum from my AVCs to take my overall Public Sector lump to the maximum revenue allowed limit, I had 183k remaining AVCs.
It was fully allowable to use these AVCs to set up my ARF.
To date after 6 years of ARF yearly drawdowns my ARF is now valued at 305k.
While the AVCs and AVC PRSA I funded during my employment had to be lonked with my Public Sector Pension, my ARF is not in any way linked with my Public Sector Pension.
When I took benefits from my Public Sector AVCs and AVC PRSA any existing link with my Public Sector Pension ended.
I am free to drawdown any amount of my own choosing from my ARF.
- the other “shortfall” between the above and Revenue maximum would be the contingent Spouses Pension which technically could be increased from 50% under the main scheme to 100%. But this is a contingent benefit, ie it only arises IF you predecease your spouse (so it might never arise).
Great info here @S class can you confirm your ARF has increased from 183k to 305k after taking approx 6 years of withdrawals from your ARF ?I am living proof that this is possible.
I have my Public Sector pension since 2018.
My ARF started at the same time and all funds in my ARF were from AVCs related to my Public Sector income.
I had an ongoing dispute regarding my Public Sector pension which necessitated a full review of my AVCs at retirement age.
This review proved that I was not overfunded.
At retirement, after taking all possible tax free lump sum from my AVCs to take my overall Public Sector lump to the maximum revenue allowed limit, I had 183k remaining AVCs.
It was fully allowable to use these AVCs to set up my ARF.
To date after 6 years of ARF yearly drawdowns my ARF is now valued at 305k.
While the AVCs and AVC PRSA I funded during my employment had to be linked with my Public Sector Pension, my ARF is not in any way linked with my Public Sector Pension.
When I took benefits from my Public Sector AVCs and AVC PRSA any existing link with my Public Sector Pension ended.
I am free to drawdown any amount of my own choosing from my ARF.
Yes that's how much it has increased after drawdowns. (Roughly 60k drawdowns taken so far.)Great info here @S class can you confirm your ARF has increased from 183k to 305k after taking approx 6 years of withdrawals from your ARF ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?