I seems that it would lessen the CGT liability payable by using the more expensive auctioneering company for sale of rented property as a large auctioneering company would have greater marketing coverage than a smaller auctioneer and the larger auctioneering fee payable will be a greater deduction against CGT payable
Is my logic flawed in this thinking ?Anyone agree or disagree?
Is my logic flawed in this thinking ?Anyone agree or disagree?