Z
So to be fully frank, you had had a few drinks,
Vanilla, you're being overly hard on the OP...My aim would be to have the chef sacked and to receive €5000 in compensation.
If you think I'm being hard you should see the treatment OP will get if he gets up on the stand looking for €5000 compensation.
Sorry guys but I've been taking statements from people in these and similar circumstances for a while now and I've found that there's often more to a story than first appears.
Let's be clear nobody is disputing that if the chef attacked the OP, was not provoked or threatened, then his actions were wrong.
However there's enough detail in the Ops' replies to make me doubt that he was not involved in some messing either on this or on another occasion to the chef's knowledge. Again that doesnt make the chefs' actions right, but it might explain them.
It strikes me as unusual that this chef would attack a customer completely unprovoked.
Of course anythings possible but what could the victim possibly have done to get the blame for being assaulted ?
If it was unusual then living in a Utopia we wouldnt need the Guards, Solicitors , laws and courts etc . The sad fact is unprovoked assaults are too common.
Of course anythings possible but what could the victim possibly have done to get the blame for being assaulted ?
Thats true but these are usually on the street and involve drink or drugs, its very rare you hear of a chef in his place of employment carrying out his work attacking a customer unprovoked.
If you think I'm being hard you should see the treatment OP will get if he gets up on the stand looking for €5000 compensation.
Sorry guys but I've been taking statements from people in these and similar circumstances for a while now and I've found that there's often more to a story than first appears.
Let's be clear nobody is disputing that if the chef attacked the OP, was not provoked or threatened, then his actions were wrong.
However there's enough detail in the Ops' replies to make me doubt that he was not involved in some messing either on this or on another occasion to the chef's knowledge. Again that doesnt make the chefs' actions right, but it might explain them.
... As reagards to having a few drinks, it was 3 and I was going to eat before I had more. ...
In late night diners like this the staff are used to a steady stream of drunks especially at 3 am and for them its nothing unusual or provocative.
As I wrote earlier: I presume the Chef was sober and fully knew what he was doing when he assaulted the victim. If anything had happened on a previous night to provoke the chef this only means what the chef did was premeditated over a much longer period than the 5 minutes necessary to fetch 3 mustard bottles.
Have to agree with KalEl. Is it really up to the people on this board to question the OP's version of events?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?