Antibiotics are not prescribed for 'flu per se or to ward off infection (only vaccines can prevent infection). Ideally antibiotics should only be taken when there is evidence of secondary bacterial infection such as purulent sputum or bacterial infection confirmed by cultures from throat swabs or sputums. A prolonged infection might also be thought to indicate secondary infection.Originally posted by delgirl
I believe it is equally drivel to take an antibiotic for Flu, which is a viral illness, except in order to ward off secondary bacterial infection.
In my experience antibiotics are being prescribed for flu and to prevent secondary bacterial infection.Antibiotics are not prescribed for 'flu per se or to ward off infection (only vaccines can prevent infection).
Yes, I should have perhaps expanded that I, and others in my family, have been offered antibiotics when presenting with flu symptoms 'just in case a secondary, bacterial infection occurs'.My experience mirrors that of Delgirl. When diagnosed with flu and\or other viral infections, I have had more than one GP prescribe an antibiotic 'just in case' of secondary infection.
I should in fairness say that I have a history of getting a nasty ear infection, which takes quite a strong antibiotic to shift, and my current GP would in these circumstances tell me not to fill the prescription unless I went downhill.
My mother also received long term antibiotic treatment to prevent a chest infection as she suffered from Bronchiectasis.sherib said:Antibiotics are not prescribed to prevent infection..
So in light of the previous 5 or 6 posts is it still drivel del girl?I believe it is equally drivel to take an antibiotic for Flu, which is a viral illness, except in order to ward off secondary bacterial infection.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?