ARF & AMRF Management Fees

fayf

Registered User
Messages
508
Hope someone can give some direction on these queries- thanks in advance for any insight.

Q1: ARF & AMRF Management Fees & Charges

For an example of :

AMRF 63.5 k
ARF 270 k

TOTAL 333.5 k

These are the approx balances, after the tax free lump sum has been taken -

Example Retiree, is in mid fifties.

What are the typical fees management involved in ARF/AMRF, for the above amounts, and is there a comparative website which shows the different provider charges, or am i being overly optimistic, on this totally transparent industry !

Does it make any sense, to have both ARF/AMRF with the same provider


Q2: AMRF Fund Growth - is growth above 63.5k, available for withdrawal

Not that a retiree in mid fifties, will get much growth on an amount of 63.5 k, but in say 10 years, there might be scope here :
Does the AMRF fund growth automatically go into a separate ARF, to enable withdrawal of excess above 63.5 k, or does it just remain where it is, and the Retiree can withdraw the excess >63.5 k whenever they wish
 
the fees should be dependent on the level service required. What type of service do you need?

You can withdraw 4% from the AMRF each year. Any growth remains in the AMRF.
 
I am wondering what the general charges levels are at, for with, and without ongoing advice
 
Given the risks of losing mental capacity during aging I would suggest ongoing advice is absolutely essential, critical even, for anyone considering an ARF.

The wholesale cost of an ARF contract is 0.30%pa
Plus fund charges
Plus advice charges

So typically you would be looking at a combined cost of around 1.60%pa to 2% depending on investment preferences including a typical ongoing advice charge.

I’ve updated this to include a more expensive investment preference such as an Ethical portfolio.

There is a statutory obligation to arrange life assurance when arranging a mortgage loan.

In my professional opinion there should be a statutory obligation to arrange ongoing advice with an ARF.

 
Last edited:
Given the risks of losing mental capacity during aging I would suggest ongoing advice is absolutely essential, critical even, for anyone considering an ARF.

The wholesale cost of an ARF contract is 0.30%pa
Plus fund charges
Plus advice charges

So typically you would be looking at a combined cost of around 1.60%pa including a typical ongoing advice charge.

There is a statutory obligation to arrange life assurance when arranging a mortgage loan.

In my professional opinion there should be a statutory obligation to arrange ongoing advice with an ARF.
Marc,
Would I be correct in saying that the fees then for a total of 335k would be in the region of 5360 euro per annum or 103 euro per week.
Say .30% for contract. Then going .75 for usual type fund charge. Leaving .55% for advise. That would be over 1800 euro for advise per annum.
I think I would sit down with an adviser once a year for an hour and pay my 150-200 euro for advise if required.
Marc my comments are not aimed at you but at the rip off fees here in our little shamrock.
A number of years ago I went to three separate highly rated financial advisers. The difference in their advise was minimal. No offence to you Marc but because the way things work in Ireland if I came to a good adviser like yourself or any of the other top advisers that post reguarly on AAM you would all give me the same advise more or less.
When oh when can Paddy invest in simple cheap products that the likes of Warren Buff. and co. recommend.
 
Why not test that assumption out?

086 043 0627

Or download a copy of my guide which runs to 70 pages and sets out the issues you need to consider in making this decision.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the replies to date, lots of homework to do here.

I have a PRB and the total fees are 0.80 % (0.55 % to provider and 0.25 % to advisor),it comes with ongoing advice, so a jump to 1.60% or a 100% increase, sounds excessive, if i am totally honest.
 
Last edited:
Marc,
I think I would sit down with an adviser once a year for an hour and pay my 150-200 euro for advise if required.

Sounds like a good idea this approach. Annual advice by way of fees.
 
It’s very probable that your “0.55%” to the provider isn’t the real cost of investing.

We have uncovered many such funds are disclosing annual management charges instead of total costs.

For low cost passive funds disclosing say 0.40% the real cost was over 1%

At the other extreme we found an externally managed specialist fund disclosing 1.75% and the real cost was in excess of 5%pa

 
Last edited:
Sounds like a good idea this approach. Annual advice by way of fees.


I agree in principle it does sound like a good idea. However some things to think about.

1) professional consultancy fees are subject to VAT whereas intermediary fees are exempt from VAT
2) if an adviser takes their fee from a pension or an ARF then that’s pre-tax money whereas writing a cheque comes from post tax money

So for every €100 of advice fees paid from a pension or Arf contract the equivalent fee for hourly consulting is up to €223 including vat and income tax depending on one’s marginal rate.

One of my proposals to the department of finance when I was on the Board of the Society of Financial Planners in Ireland was to make provision for tax exempt financial advice annually up to say €1000pa to regularize this position.
 
After taking tax free lump sum fayf has 335k roughly to invest.

Unfortunately average person in Ireland does not have this amount in their pension.

Investing this 335k would not be he same as a person say having 2 million and multi assets.

Congrats to fayf on having this sum. While I do not know or have detail around fayf,s full financial situation I would suggest that investing the 335k and talking to the person the risk/reward discussion would not be as complex as a person with 2 million and multi assets.

So in turn investments should not be super complex and investment charges in turn should be simple.
Adviser advises fayf to invest in certain fund etc. Fayf asks what is the actual cost for this type of investment you are suggesting.
In other words just tell me the exact charges on the investments you are recommending. If its not simple walk away.

So really getting down to VAT etc and hidden charges is really a waste of time on such sums as mentioned above. Why in Gods name would fayf want to pay out 1800 euro a year when 223 euro would do. If any investment is not simply understood why would fayf or anybody consider investing.

KISS. For me KEEP IT SIMPLE STUPID works.

Surely fayf does not need advise on complex investments/structures etc.
 
"It's unwise to pay too much, but it's worse to pay too little. ... When you pay too little, you sometimes lose everything, because the thing you bought was incapable of doing the thing it was bought to do. The common law of business balance prohibits paying a little and getting a lot — it can't be done"

John Ruskin


This has nothing to do with the size of the account or if the whole account is invested in a single index fund. An ARF is an extremely complex structure (hence my point that there should be a statutory requirement to appoint an adviser) and the main reason for this is that where the owner has lost mental capacity there needs to be someone competent to step in and act in the best interests of the retiree who would be completely incapable of making any decisions. Its not about whether or not you can make decisions today. You aren't taking out an ARF for a year, you are taking it out for the whole of the rest of your life and you will get older each year and require more assistance at precisely the time that the value of your account is almost certainly worth less than it is today.

I have a client who literally has no family who can step into this role before anyone says that a power of attorney to a child solves it. Not everyone has children and even then not everyone wants to put this "burden" onto their family.

I'm also going to dismiss out of court the suggested cost of meeting an adviser for an hour a year as neither adequate, appropriate or commercially realistic

I'd like to see where anyone can find an adviser who can run a regulated business and charge their clients €150 to €200 once a year

Annual Meeting
Meeting room cost (let's say a serviced office which charges from €50 to €100 per hour) or maybe we will just hang around a hotel lobby while discussing your personal confidential details?
Travel costs to meeting ( maybe I'll walk into town?)
Staff Costs (advisers salary? what about support staff?)
Regulatory levies - includes the cost of contribution to the investor compensation scheme
Continuing Professional Development - all advisers in Ireland are required to complete a minimum of 15 hours a year of CPD. A good CPD event costs €100 or €200 to attend or I can save some money going to "free" events which are sponsored by product producers - I wonder if that might result in less objective advice??? However, for full disclosure I have an additional 70 hours on top of the minimum due to the additional professional designations I hold.
Professional Indemnity Insurance a legal requirement. I've just renewed my PI policy €6562.50 including 5% levy so that's 32 one hour meetings at €200 an hour just to pay for my Insurance. So I'd need at least 32 clients just to pay for Professional Indemnity premium so I'm going to need a lot of clients which leads onto
Marketing costs - how much do I need to spent on marketing my services?
Update Anti Money Laundering Documentation a legal requirement - could use a smart phone for this but monthly contract required
Update Know your customer data a regulatory requirement - do we do this in the meeting? Doesn't leave much time to talk about the ARF does it?
Obtain valuation statement (since you are not paying for an ongoing service) do you bring the statement and I read it really quickly or do I phone the ARF provider beforehand and spend an hour of my time on hold listening to the Fields of Athenry?

And then the big question: are you paying for an hour of my time or my experience and credentials? Are you really sure that you want advice on your life savings from a newly qualified inexperienced adviser who is willing to give you their time for free?

It's not the fault of advisers that they have to charge to provide a regulated service in Ireland

So, in summary the cost to provide an insured, regulated Professional Service in Ireland for a €335,000 ARF

4069

Example for illustrative purposes only

4071

Marc Westlake CFP®, TEP, APFS, EFP ,QFA
CHARTERED, CERTIFIED & EUROPEAN FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional
AND REGISTERED TRUST & ESTATE PRACTITIONER
 
Last edited:
"So really getting down to VAT etc and hidden charges is really a waste of time on such sums as mentioned above. "

This is an example over the last 3 years of a well-known low cost index fund (the red dot) compared to the "identical" same fund offered to Irish Pension and ARF clients from an Irish Insurance Company (the blue dot).

Now I know that we pay 0.15%pa for the blue dot and I can prove that because I can obtain audited annual accounts
The difference in annualised peformance between the two versions of the fund is 0.49%pa so therefore the total cost of the fund to Irish investors is 0.64%pa

The provider is disclosing an annual management charge of 0.30% before allowing for distribution costs so on a €335,000 pension fund that's €1,139pa in undisclosed costs and an overall cost difference of €1641pa for one fund.


4070

Here's another example same fund manager different fund

4072

That's a 0.94%pa difference in performance over the last 3 years.

We pay 0.18%pa and I can prove that because I can obtain audited annual accounts

so an Irish investor has been paying 1.12%pa for the same fund

Now our €335,000 ARF investor is out €3149pa in fund management cost differences.

Hopefully this makes the point that even in a simple two fund portfolio of well known low cost index funds there is a considerable amount on the table.

Investors can either bundle all of this together into a simple off the shelf opaque structure or construct a more transparent solution but please don't say that it isn't worth looking into this in some detail
 
Last edited:
I cannot disagree with any of the above Marc.

That said I have as most customers will have no interest in your costs or regulation money laundering issues indemnity insurance. I as any customer would expect any professional to be up to date and compliant in all these areas.
If I go and see a medical Consultant I have no interest in his/her indemnity insurance registration etc .I just want them to fix my problem.

I dont mean to be disrespectful but most people would be the same. They want a good service at a fair price.



1. Wholesale rate to set up ARF .3% no problem.

2. I would discuss where I would invest my pension money with adviser. I would choose where to invest funds. If the adviser did not know straight up what the actual bottom line on the fund/investment vehicle charges were I would walk.

If I sat down with an adviser for lets say 3 full hours and supplied detailed information on my financial situation I would expect them to come up with a detailed plan/projection. Then say follow up with another meeting to fine tune and nail down the detail.

So a bit of time and effort on the advisers behalf. So lets say some advisers would charge 1% of 335k.
So 3350 euro.
Not no problem but can live with that,

3. As most people monies invested in ARF AMRF is a long hall job. Charging even .5% or 1650 euro advise charges for most probably a print out of performance for the previous year and little more is money for old rope to me.

Yes certain clients will want ongoing advise or maybe just find comfort in consulting in financial advisers.

Me. I wish I could pay the .3% and go solo. Im retired at 56. I might start drawing down my pension at 60 pending on value etc at that time.

The only time I have lost serious money is taking financial advise from lads with lots of letters behind their name. I have a few letters behind mine.

But what has worked for me and the reason I am retired is KISS.

Keep It Simple Stupid.

Nobody will ever look after your money better than yourself.


LOL






:p
 
Thanks for the comments.

Don’t think you address my salient point that

Approximately 15% of adults aged 60 and over suffer from a mental disorder. Which sort of flies in the face of your argument that the best person to manage your wealth over the whole of the rest of your life is you.
 
Last edited:
The difference in annualised peformance between the two versions of the fund is 0.49%pa so therefore the total cost of the fund to Irish investors is 0.64%pa
Do your comparators include the 0.30% platform charge and your 0.55% investment management fee (that obviously wouldn't apply to a unit linked fund)?

Incidentally, kudos for being so transparent about the total costs of your services. I guess people can form their own view on whether or not they represent good value.
 
0.18 + 0.3 + 0.55 = 1.03
Vs 1.12

I’m struggling to see the argument
 
Last edited:
Oh, then I’ll spell it out
That’s the wholesale cost
The retail price as disclosed in the SID for that fund is 0.92%

So you are getting off balance sheet custody with a 1.7 Trillion dollar custodian plus full discretionary management for 11 basis points

Equally I can change the fund manager for the same index and get it for 12 bps for the OCF.

Or I can use a different version of the same index from the same fund manager and I’m down to 7 bps

If I overweight the US relative to Europe I’m closer to 4bps

I could go on
 
Last edited:
Sorry, what's a SID?

The bottom line is your unbundled service is more expensive than the unit-linked equivalent.
 
Back
Top