Agencies? Agents? Companies?Getting ripped off by agencies is not the future
I think you know what I mean.Agencies? Agents? Companies?
But that has nothing to do with what I said. Residents for themselves.Not really. Agent or company? If it's the former then the management company of which one is a member/shareholder can deal with any alleged rip-off by ditching the agent and employing another. If it's the latter then the member/shareholder can easily take direct action (e.g. stand for election, mobilise other member/shareholders) to deal with any alleged rip-off on the part of the company which is also circumscribed in its behaviour by CRO rules and legislation.
Of course some people won't let the facts get in the way of a good rip-off Ireland victimhood claim.
What needs to be done day to day? Its more like on a weekly basis. Plus, when, as I said, someone takes the initiative to show the other residents how much they will be saving, how well the estate will work as a community and the fact that the security they get will be from their neighbours, not a stranger you hardly ever see. When its done liek this, people like to help each other out.If we are talking about apartments (which the OP was asking about), or any large scale development, I don't think it is feasible to depend on the residents themselves to run it without:
(a) a legally binding agreement to pay fees signed by all owners; and
(b) someone to run the company day-to-day.
Re. (b), if you can summon enough volunteers to ensure fees are collected, negotiate contracts with service providers, field (irate) calls from other owners, send out circulars to owners, organise and run the AGM (certainly not I role I would relish), then fair enough. But doing this for a development of 200-300 apartments (common enough around Dublin these days) on a voluntary basis seems slighly unrealistic IMHO.
The agent's fee is only one part of the overall management fee. Getting rid of agents altogther isn't ideal in the case of large developments IMHO.
What needs to be done day to day? Its more like on a weekly basis. Plus, when, as I said, someone takes the initiative to show the other residents how much they will be saving, how well the estate will work as a community and the fact that the security they get will be from their neighbours, not a stranger you hardly ever see. When its done liek this, people like to help each other out.
Nobody needs to know on doors. They can have weelk or fortnightly meetings. Or even a bank account number to pay it to. You migth not dream of doing it because you dont know your neighbours. I dont know your situation but would you feel more comfortable doing it where you grew up?Who is going to volunteer to knock on every door to collect money for public liability insurance? In my parents estate they do everything on a voluntary basis because it is a small settled estate. No need for management companies and everyone takes it in turn to maintain the common areas.
In my own estate I wouldn't dream of even attempting this and there is only about 50 units in the estate.
Nobody needs to know on doors. They can have weelk or fortnightly meetings. Or even a bank account number to pay it to. You migth not dream of doing it because you dont know your neighbours. I dont know your situation but would you feel more comfortable doing it where you grew up?
The estate my dad did it on had a few hundred houses. House owners arent kids and are more likely to pay when its saving them money, they are getting a nicer living environment back and often wouldnt want their neighbours to think they are broke. I think it can work, especially if estates are broken up into smaller sectors.Even with a bank a/c number what do you do if someone doesn't pay? Call around and demand the money? Send them a solicitors letter?
If we are going to build large housing estates and apartment blocks we need to be realistic about how they will be managed.
As I said, where my parents live it is easy for them to do things on a voluntary basis because it is a small settled estate. I don't think a house has even been sold there in over six years.
In a bigger development it is just not practical to maintain the area in this way and so you either need a LA to do it or a MC and MA.
What needs to be done day to day? Its more like on a weekly basis. Plus, when, as I said, someone takes the initiative to show the other residents how much they will be saving, how well the estate will work as a community and the fact that the security they get will be from their neighbours, not a stranger you hardly ever see. When its done liek this, people like to help each other out.
But like I said, it could be cut down to smaller sectors if needed.If you feel it is feasible in a development of 200-300, then fair enough. I just don't think so myself.
If we are going to build large housing estates and apartment blocks we need to be realistic about how they will be managed.
The estate my dad did it on had a few hundred houses. House owners arent kids and are more likely to pay when its saving them money, they are getting a nicer living environment back and often wouldnt want their neighbours to think they are broke. I think it can work, especially if estates are broken up into smaller sectors.
Property management fee = 2k pa over 30 year mortgage term = 60k + inflation. So in real terms, you could probably buy a house that's 100k more expensive simply by refusing to purchase a managed property.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?