The majority of people should have a full driving license by the time they turn 18 because so many full-time jobs require an element of driving, whether it is on the road completely, moving between business locations or going to meet clients / suppliers.
The vast, vast majority of jobs require you to get to an office or shop and sit there for eight hours before going home - they absolutely do not require a car.
Limiting your choice of employment to those Jobs that are within reach of a decent public transport system.
Perhaps but that's a choice people need to make when they're choosing a place of residence or employment. If you decide not to do that, you're free to drive assuming there is a decent route (ie no congestion) and parking (ie not most city centre offices, no IFSC offices and not all Sandyford/Citywest offices).
I also agree with the OP that those who choose not to drive saddle others with their choice.
How? Say no to a lift if they bother you that much. I know plenty of people don't drive either because they choose not to have a car or because they never bothered to learn. They survive on their own two feet perfectly well without always looking for lifts.
How? Say no to a lift if they bother you that much.
That's not practical. If an elderly mother needs a lift up to Tesco to do some heavy shopping, or someone to drop them to Bridge or whatever, they're not going to agree to someone booking a taxi for them or paying the fare for them. They'll either not go or insist on paying the taxi fare themselves. It just smacks of the driver in the family refusing to give them a lift.As long as non-drivers don't expect other people to drive them around then what's the problem?
If there is an elderly parent that needs to be brought somewhere tell your non-driving sibling to get a taxi. Doing that once a month is still far cheaper than running a car.
The real issue here is selfish people. They usually display their selfishness in more ways than just expecting free transport.
That's not practical. If an elderly mother needs a lift up to Tesco to do some heavy shopping, or someone to drop them to Bridge or whatever, they're not going to agree to someone booking a taxi for them or paying the fare for them. They'll either not go or insist on paying the taxi fare themselves. It just smacks of the driver in the family refusing to give them a lift.
But having to buy and maintain a car you don't need, just to give lifts to other people is?That's not practical.
But having to buy and maintain a car you don't need, just to give lifts to other people is?
I didn't say you had to buy a car. If you can drive, you can drive anyone's car and share the task of driving people around, doing part of the driving on long trips etc.
But that still doesn't solve the problem of being "a nuisance" and putting people out by needing to borrow the car.I didn't say you had to buy a car. If you can drive, you can drive anyone's car and share the task of driving people around
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?