Hi RKQ,
Thanks for your words of support.
Geez! Were we live? I thought it was going to be edited later, LOL!
Initially I thought Brian Montaut of the AA had gone a little overboard when referring to the RIAI as Royals in his speech.
But I say it hit home with O'Donoghue and it was all I could to to keep from laughing out loud when he made his point.
It ended in some good natured banter about royalty surviving so long - there was no acrimoney.
I felt the most interesting comment was passed by the RIAI just at the end.
I put it to the RIAI during the presentation that the MRIAI standard was not the "Minimum Standard" enshrined in the EU Directives but that Graduate was. The logical inference of this is that many self-taught architects throughout the EU would be capable of reaching this Graduate standard in terms of their built work - many may have already done so.
The position of the RIAI as confirmed yesterday is that MRIAI is the "Minimum Standard" and not the Graduate Degree as written into two EU Directives.
The RIAI stated at the end of the Joint Oireachtas Committee on the Environment Meeting yesterday that the EU will shortly state that that the setting of the bar at Graduate level was erroneous!
The AA will be going back to the RIAI on this later today as this seems like a relatively recent occurrence.
After all, have we seen weekly press releases from the EU, the RIAI or Montague Communications for the past twenty years asserting that this was an error?
Have the heads of the schools of architecture all been asleep?
Where does this leave all previous certificates issued by degree holders?
The MRIAI "qualification" sets the bar at an arbitrary level decided by the RIAI, not an approved level as determined by two schools of architecture - "judgement by peers" as the RIAI like to term it. Well, thanks guys, but I was judged by outside assessors, people not even directly affiliated to Bolton Street - one from France as I recall - all of whom were demonstrably independent of the cliques operating in Ireland.
For the record, I have no problem with rRegistration - its a good thing IMO - but arbitrarily setting the bar higher than the minimum set out for the past twenty years is not good governance. This will make it impossible for respected older practitioners to become registered and will be poor payment for their years of service to their communities.
This may be a Gormley/RIAI agenda, but if there really is some hidden, unaccountable fool in some back room in Brussels interfering with the standing of the Graduate qualification who thinks this won't come back to haunt them, he/she has a big surprise coming.
If you're going to rely on the law to establish you as an authority, then you have to be seen to support the existing law, not undermine it or re-write it retrospectively.
You can tell this one is growing legs - its going to run and run.
ONQ.
[broken link removed]