It struck me reading through this site that many people have vastly different views on hours and years a person should work.
The funniest one I see is people complaining that they need to work 40 years to get a full pension.
I reckon you're doing well to start work at say 22 (4 years of college) and retire at 62. Would you expect a full pension at an earlier age or for less years worked?
Also, what do people think are appropriate weekly hours? < 35, < 40, < 50 or 50+?
Finally is there a view on the appropriate numbers of hols per year? <10, <20, <30 or 30+?
The funniest one I see is people complaining that they need to work 40 years to get a full pension.
I reckon you're doing well to start work at say 22 (4 years of college) and retire at 62. Would you expect a full pension at an earlier age or for less years worked?
Also, what do people think are appropriate weekly hours? < 35, < 40, < 50 or 50+?
Finally is there a view on the appropriate numbers of hols per year? <10, <20, <30 or 30+?