On what basis? Have they ceded all rights and responsibilities about "proceeding along the carriageway in an orderly manner with all due care and attention" to a complete stranger on the basis of a simple non-verbal communication?... On a more serious note ,if you give someone the nod/Gesture,as in flashing your lights to tell them to drive out,and they then are involved in an accident ,you can be sued!! ...
On what basis? Have they ceded all rights and responsibilities about "proceeding along the carriageway in an orderly manner with all due care and attention" to a complete stranger on the basis of a simple non-verbal communication?
Is the same eejit who was smoking out the hotel window now driving on our roads?
On what basis? Have they ceded all rights and responsibilities about "proceeding along the carriageway in an orderly manner with all due care and attention" to a complete stranger on the basis of a simple non-verbal communication?
Is the same eejit who was smoking out the hotel window now driving on our roads?
Ah here we go, I see where this is heading ...
On what basis? Have they ceded all rights and responsibilities about "proceeding along the carriageway in an orderly manner with all due care and attention" to a complete stranger on the basis of a simple non-verbal communication?
Is the same eejit who was smoking out the hotel window now driving on our roads?
From memory gesturing to another driver to pull out etc. is a penalty in the driving test. Not sure whether it's a straight fail or just a category 2 offence.
Well maybe it's because they have been in the queue for ages and resent slightly the fact that you can join it relatively easy.
The route I take to work has a long tailback every - about half way along this route a narrow sideroad joins this road. People coming from a certain direction use this route to skip the long queue - they look at us with pleading eyes to let them out even though they've only been queuing for 5 seconds.
Maybe that's why people aren't jumping for joy at the prospect at letting them out!
If you mean going towards demolishing another pub educated lawyer's belief in urban legends, then you're probably right.
On what basis? Have they ceded all rights and responsibilities about "proceeding along the carriageway in an orderly manner with all due care and attention" to a complete stranger on the basis of a simple non-verbal communication?
Is the same eejit who was smoking out the hotel window now driving on our roads?
Another well thought out, meaningful, helpful post.
Posters who choose not to believe the post ,should go ahead and gesture and if the other car,who has exited due to your indication happens to run into an oncoming/overtaking etc vehicle/bike dont say you were not warned.
I'm still not clear on the basis for the potential law-suit where I as the gesturer guide the gesturee into some form of automotive catastrophe. What could I be sued for?On what basis? ...
340 of them and counting baby!
So we should just accept your word? How about something to back it up like some actual piece of legislation or an explanation of how the principles of negligence would apply, given, as already posted, the onus is on the other vehicle to ensure it is safe to pull out. Even better an actual case would help.
The onus is on you BABY , If you drive YOU should know the rules,or do you want every law and rule of the road posted here BABY.
I'm still not clear on the basis for the potential law-suit where I as the gesturer guide the gesturee into some form of automotive catastrophe. What could I be sued for?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?