You really think that? Anyone who posts in the public domain the intricate background details of any employment-related difficulty that may in due course culminate in future litigation is at the very least incredibly naive.I don’t necessarily agree. It’s not dissimilar to asking for financial advice.
You clearly misunderstand what professional advice entails. Accountability on the part of the professional, for starters.And why would you assume the advice wouldn’t be professional?
With respect, you seem to be getting a bit ahead of things. Nobody mentioned the necessity to provide “intricate details”.You really think that? Anyone who posts in the public domain the intricate background details of any employment-related difficulty that may in due course culminate in future litigation is at the very least incredibly naive.
This site operates to provide anonymised financial and other advice. Where’s the accountability there?You clearly misunderstand what professional advice entails. Accountability on the part of the professional, for starters.
Not in the context of the level of advisory services that solicitors provide to paying customers in relation to employment law issues - which is what the OP mentioned in their opening postWith respect, you seem to be getting a bit ahead of things. Nobody mentioned the necessity to provide “intricate details”.
It’s possible for an anonymous poster to present a broad description of the issue they’re experiencing and to seek the anonymous opinion of others on what their options are. It’s done frequently.
I couldn't have put it better myself.This site operates to provide anonymised financial and other advice. Where’s the accountability there?
In seeking recommendations, the OP is correctly cautious about the quality of any employment law practitioner he might engage.Not in the context of the level of advisory services that solicitors provide to paying customers in relation to employment law issues - which is what the OP mentioned in their opening post
With the greatest respect to the late Richard, he wasn’t the only decent employment law practitioner any more than Dermot Bannon is the only architect in Ireland.
I would not recommend Barry Crushell. I was very disappointed with him. He charges 250 for first consultation. During that time he is verbally drafting his letter of advice rather than listening or asking questions.Bumping this as looking for the same recommendation I know Richard Grogan sadly passed recently so any other names welcome.
Has anyone used Barry Crushell or Anne O'Connell?
You expect him to work for nothing and do nothing during the consultation?I would not recommend Barry Crushell. I was very disappointed with him. He charges 250 for first consultation. During that time he is verbally drafting his letter of advice rather than listening or asking questions.
I would assume it would be professional, meaning it would come at a substantial fee. That of course is not necessarily related to whether it's useful advice or not.And why would you assume the advice wouldn’t be professional?
That's far from the definition of professional. Look it up.I would assume it would be professional, meaning it would come at a substantial fee. That of course is not necessarily related to whether it's useful advice or not.
You can never resist having a pop even where its clear you do not have anywhere near enough information to do so.You expect him to work for nothing and do nothing during the consultation?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?