You're missing something
AIB agreed this increase last year.
And then went back on it and wanted to introduce a 5% cut. They didn't manage to do this
BOI gave this increase last year, were there posters calling that crazy here last year? I haven't searched past threads
This is for lower grade staff below management level.
All they are getting is what was agreed in 2008, no more and no less
You're missing something
AIB agreed this increase last year.
And then went back on it and wanted to introduce a 5% cut. They didn't manage to do this
BOI gave this increase last year, were there posters calling that crazy here last year? I haven't searched past threads
This is for lower grade staff below management level.
All they are getting is what was agreed in 2008, no more and no less
Great - I presume you are supporting going back to the 6.5% increases agreed in social partnership in Aug 2008, and dropping the pension levy cuts brought in since.You're missing something
AIB agreed this increase last year.
And then went back on it and wanted to introduce a 5% cut. They didn't manage to do this
BOI gave this increase last year, were there posters calling that crazy here last year? I haven't searched past threads
This is for lower grade staff below management level.
All they are getting is what was agreed in 2008, no more and no less
Great - I presume you are supporting going back to the 6.5% increases agreed in social partnership in Aug 2008, and dropping the pension levy cuts brought in since.
Plenty of things were agreed last year that are no longer possible.
Regarding the 'lower grade' staff - it is quite clear that AIB needs to reduce its costs and headcount drastically. The only reason it hasn't enforced wide scale job cuts is that it the government has leaned on it to retain jobs.
But you want to turn the clock back for AIB to 2008 - right? So why just AIB - If it is fair for them, it is fair for public servants - right?Pension levy?
I never brought a public service issue into this thread
True, employers can claim an inability to pay. Maybe AIB management should have done this.
They have legal teams and advisors so they must have been aware.
But you want to turn the clock back for AIB to 2008 - right? So why just AIB - If it is fair for them, it is fair for public servants - right?
If a private employer is being propped up by taxpayers' money then the comparison complainer is making is valid.
x
I don't wish ill to anyone - but it absolutely unreasonable and unfair to expect workers across the economy to prop up jobs in an insolvent business. The government needs to put a stop to this madness!
I assume then that Complainer would also be in favour of 'turning back the clock' for annual automatic PC/CS increments - still being paid.
Instead of people shouting abuse at AIB, why don't they direct their anger at the real cause of the problem i.e. trade unions and social partnership. AIB went to the Labour Court looking for a pay cut which of course was resisted by the Unions and the Labour Court told AIB to pay the award.
People can argue and with some justifcation that AIB could have ignored the Labour Court but there is a tradition in this Country that the Labour Court has the final say with regard to these sort of disputes. And to be fair, there needs to be a final arbitor or else there would be chaos. If AIB ignored the findings, no party would have engaged in the industrial relations process and there would have been chaos.
ou're missing something
AIB agreed this increase last year.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?