B
It seems that there is no room to maneuver when it comes to dropping the actual affordable price that they are charging us and the only area they can/will help out in is with reducing the clawback percentage. From looking at other threads on this site it appears that this is the case.
It is very unfair as you would think the whole idea of an affordable housing scheme would be to provide houses/apartments at an affordable price for those that meet the criteria but unfortunately for any of us that signed contracts over the last year and half or so, we have not really benefited from it and in reality we are paying close to open market value as it currently stands.
The way it looks at the moment is, if you have been made an offer and accepted it you can either:-
· Walk away, lose your deposit and wait for another offer as the prices of new developments will be more realistic or the scheme will collapse.
· Take the reduced clawback and close the sale.
· Buy on the open market which is a lot more viable now in the current climate which still will mean losing your deposit.
Personally I am going to go ahead with it, it is a lovely apartment in a great area and when we ever get out of this slump and property prices stabilize Marrsfield will look a good investment down the line when all the work on this project is completed.
What is unfair? You originally got a deal that was close to 100,000 EURO off the price private purchasers paid at the time. You were very happy to sign the contract to lock in that good deal. You benefited to a massive extent over open market purchasers at that time. You thought it was very affordable at the time. Why is it suddenly not affordable now? If the value had stayed the same I guess 90% of people here wouldn't be whinging.
But I agree with one thing, the affordable housing scheme just made it affordable for one group, the builders.
You brought up the issue of 'fair' into the discussion. The contract that you signed at the time was '100,000' euro or so 'fairer' than private purchasers.
Now it is not so beneficial, I am sorry about that, really. But there is no 'unfairness' about it to you at all. You didn't need to purchase. You think losing money is unfair just because it happened to you. I'm no financial expert but I can make my point quite clearly. Now that you are losing money you suddenly think it's unfair, FAIRNESS comes into the equation, that's what gets my goat.
Of course you could have got a 100% mortgage at the time and purchased privately, how unfair do you think that would have been? You my friend are still lucky.
The AH scheme is not a good scheme and is broadly not beneficial to both taxpayers and it's recipients. It just props up developers pricing.
But then about 2 weeks ago she said they were'nt happy with the builders response and they were goin back to them again, working hard on a better outcome for us. But she would'nt say to much and give away to much info away, saying at this moment I would'nt be at liberty to say. And they also requested my new valuation and approval in principle from bank stating what I can get based on new valuation."she was remaining positive there would be a positive outcome from this"
Hi Marrsfield AH buyers!
I was told last week by Pierse that I couldn't get in to snag my apt because of safety reasons and rang AHP to discuss what was going on, mentioning that there were more than a few of us displeased and they told me that they were in talks with Pierse Homes to renegotiate the price of our apartments so our clawback could be reduced. Anyone else hear this? No clear time frame or updates given even though it's been 3 months now since I got my pre-completion letter!!
rondon
I had to get letter from bank saying what they currently valued property at (290 compared to 382 last year!) how much they were originally going to lend me and the reduced amount they'll now lend based on the lower valuation. This went to AHP's solicitor. Apparently AHP need it to try to negotiate with the council. Waiting to hear back now. Will post when I hear anything
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?