Maybe ONQ can comment on this but I was talking to an Architect recently and he said it is better to have north facing glazing triple glazed and all other elevations double glazed in terms of cost savings.
Patrick,
My apologies for missing your post.
I am not subscribed to any threads - I usually just look at the boards regularly and catch the questions as they arise.
The question you ask is a a bit of a loaded one because while you can certainly make the argument on solar exposure, there are many other factors to consider.
However winter is the time that glazing insulation pays for itself and while some solar gain is available that might justify a lesser specification to the south, heat costings doesn't rely on window specification alone - house design plays an important part.
After the sun goes down - which depending of local overshadowing and topography can be for as much as 18 hours a day or more, window specification doesn't seem to count for as much it is the housing weatherproofing and sealing, building plan proportion and orientation, prevailing wind, exposure/sheltering elements on site and the ambient temperature in the locality that matters.
We live on a hill and the temperature can drop up to two degrees between us and houses in the town below.
We are also on the north facing part of the hill with two story houses uphill and to the rear of us restricting our available direct south light in the winter months.
Previously we lived on the south face of a quarry and we had marvellous south light all your around, assuming the sky was cloudless, and even when it was cloudy there was significant solar gain.
So let's consider your window specification vs location proposal.
The winter is the time when increased insulation specification comes into its own.
It is also the time when there is least sunlight, perhaps only 75% of the day is lit at all in the depth of winter.
This winter we have seen -3 and -4 where we are - unheard of previously during the daytime - and dense cloud cover seriously reducing the amount of solar gain available.
But with glazing the amount of heat getting out is at least as important as the amount of heat being allowed in.
So at night in minus 8 (!) bigger windows of any specification let out more heat than smaller ones, and double glazing lets our more heat than single glazing, all else being equal.
As I posted previously on this thread, you can sink your money into high performing components, and yet not acheive as much savings as you could by good design.
In the present case, yes you could install triple glazing to the north elevation.
But you could also design the house to eliminate most of the windows that face north and by simply omitting hi-spec north facing windows you could save a fortune AND ensure the house retains more heat.
I hope that sheds some light (sic) on the subject for you and thanks for asking
ONQ.
[broken link removed]
All advice on AAM is remote from the situation and cannot be relied upon as a defence or support - in and of itself - should legal action be taken.
Competent legal and building professionals should be asked to advise in Real Life with rights to inspect and issue reports on the matters at hand.