ubiquitous
Registered User
- Messages
- 3,782
I actually was chatting to a few friends from England and America recently, and the fees they pay to dentists, accountants etc are much less than we pay in " rip off Ireland", as Eddie Hobbs calls it. Of course there are those who charge high fees in New York and London, but the average overheads in a small town in Ireland - never mind the level of expertise or experience probably - are not like in the centre of Manhatten or London.
So you think it should cost € 24,000 to value a very small business, whose accounts were already done by the same firm for many years ( and whose annual accountancy fees are not included in the € 24000 ) ?
This is indeed market forces at work - demand for a skill in short supply driving up the price - but that does not also mean that it is not a rip-off.
Going to your office, clicking here, clicking there, changing a setting: €1.00
Knowing where to click and what setting needed to be changed: €9,999.00
Are you saying that accountants in small Irish towns are charging similar rates as firms in Manhattan or London? I very much doubt if this is the case. .
In the meantime, don't try to tar all with the same brush.
You forgot dentists!I am most certainly not. No body which has thousands of members is the same.
@ 600 an hour, thats 24,000 per week for a 40 hour week. Whats so special about his knowledge ? Does he think he is Gods gift to the economy, the arrogant greedy git ?
In fairness rabbit you have said yourself you are not an accountant I also suspect you do not work in corporate finance or else you might understand how difficult and complex it can be to value a private company.
If I were taking in €600 per hour, I wouldn't bother working a 40 hour week.
Not all dentists are the exact same. For example, some I know work half as hard and charge twice as much as other dentists.
at 70k per annum tuition fees and no income?Do you count in things like specialisations within dentristry, where the person put in a few extra years training?
Why on earth should the existing teachers be expected to pay the price for proper staffing? If we need more teachers, they should be hired and paid for from general taxation.Our gov won`t hire our unemployed teachers for fear of upsetting permanent teachers....a small reduction in the perm teachers salary would see 10000 more teachers employed at no extra cost and at great benefit to our students education.
Why on earth should the existing teachers be expected to pay the price for proper staffing? If we need more teachers, they should be hired and paid for from general taxation.
Nothing against teachers who are a fine lot.
HOWEVER just using them as an example of a section of our workforce who are cosseted,protected, unfireable and not subject to competition from their unemployed counterparts.Into the bargain they get benchmarking and very good pensions.
The above argument was used in the 80s when we had high unemployment. The people in the "protected" sector did not want to pay extra taxation to have more employment.....inevitably people like teachers would have to pay more taxation to facilitate this process and of course they were opposed.
Yet the private employees are in most cases exposed to full wage competition both from irish and foreign workers.
There are clearly double standards at work here.
Hardly the majority of teachers though?Take all those male teachers/ex gaa players that are radio/tv presenters.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?