If you ask people for a "good one" it is highly subjective to their own individual case circumstances.
- Is not incentivised to drag it out for larger fees
Your barrister may be the best or the worst in the country for all I know...passionately articulating your case points
The problem for men is the above seems to assume that the mother is the person best placed to provide the best welfare. If we believe in equality then such assumptions are anachronistic.Our Family Law system has many faults, but I can tell you that the overriding concern is the welfare of the children of the marriage.
It would be more correct to say the assumption is that the primary carer is the person best placed to provide the best welfare. It's just that the primary carer is most often the mother. Very few men make a case to the courts to become the primary carer with whom the children will primarily reside.The problem for men is the above seems to assume that the mother is the person best placed to provide the best welfare. If we believe in equality then such assumptions are anachronistic.
Sure, but there is an assumption by the court that they won't. That's the problem. When both parents work and childcare duties are evenly split, or the father does the larger proportion, there is still a presumption that the mother will be the primary caregiver.It would be more correct to say the assumption is that the primary carer is the person best placed to provide the best welfare. It's just that the primary carer is most often the mother. Very few men make a case to the courts to become the primary carer with whom the children will primarily reside.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?