I'm totally lost with you two. But you are both accountants. I know I have a blind spot in relation to tables. So please bear with me.
I prefer when it's laid out like this.
Property of 300K, property tax is 495. You defer for 10 years.
Actual Tax
So after 10 years you owe 495 X 10 so 4950. That's very simple. And no loss to the person paying it 10 years hence. Plus if there's inflation this amount has been actually eaten away. Plus you had the use of the money, plus you can now pay it out of the proceeds of sale. Plus as a percentage of the property value it works out at less than 2% of the property value.
Interest on the Tax 4% simple interest
In post 2 BB said it was 495 X 10 X4% = 198. But it's a different calculation because that's a 10 year deferal of the tax from year one. For year 2 it would be the tax deferred for 9 years... Is that what that table is meant to show?
Perhaps a worked example might help.
Actually I think I get it now. You take the 495 X 220% and get 1089. So interest after 10 years is 1089.
Therefore after 10 years deferral you pay tax of 4950 and interest of 1089. total 6039. So back to the post I made above you end up after 10 years paying 2 % of the property value as the tax including interest.
The 220% scared me and would also do so for a lot of people. But 2% is fine (imo)