Simple market economics will put a dirty burger joint or food outlet out of business far quicker than any inspector. Once word gets around people steer well clear of such places. That's why so many restaurant and takeaway outlets close so soon after they open.
That makes no sense? So only locals might be lucky about avoiding food poisioning? What about day trippers, people there for business or tourists?
I prefer the idea of qualified inspection, instead of waiting for 'word to get around'.
Some of the findings from that report were disgusting, and word obviously hadn't gotten around around maggot ridden food and putrid fish in those cases!
No business will survive for long on day tripper custom alone. Day trippers will not be attracted to a place if its obvious that its not prospering from local custom, even in honeypots like Temple Bar.
To be frank, anyone would need to be drunk, stoned or out of their mind to eat out of any of those places, and I don't see why public monies should be spent on protecting the blue plastic bag brigade from their own stupidity and excess.
If I was to pick an agency to shut down it wouldn't be the FSAI and it certainly wouldn't be for doing the job we need them to do!!!
If that hot dog guy wasn't storing his food right, im glad he was caught. Next time he might be more careful and someone might avoid getting sick, and having to paying doctors fee and missing days off work etc.
Next time, he will probably just get one of his buddies to man the stand, and give a false name and address if challenged.
I don't understand the point you are making? Your point seems to suggest more regulation is needed. in which case i agree with you.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?