Just to correct a small matter. The "leverage" in this case is costing the OP more than the asset is earning. The sock at the bottom of my cupboard gives me a better return than that. I'm not advocating equities either, I'm just highlighting the costs versus returns.
Well all anyone can know is that the OP would be making a loss for the foreseeable future. Combined with transaction costs it is hard to see the OP being in positive territory for a significent period of time. Every month that you pay more in interest than you receive in rent probably pushes your breakeven point out by another 2 months. Goodbodys [broken link removed] houseprices to fall 8% next year after falling 5% this. I can't tell the future but I can tell when someone is making a loss today. If you have some further insight that allows you to gauge where the value of the asset will be at some point in the future then go for it.Your sock will give give you zilch return one way or the other over the next twenty years. Beause the cost of funds exceeds the return at present( in this particular case) does not mean that the investment won't show a positive return at the end of twenty years. ( which, imo, is the timeframe for an rpi play)
Well all anyone can know is that the OP would be making a loss for the foreseeable future. Combined with transaction costs it is hard to see the OP being in positive territory for a significent period of time. Every month that you pay more in interest than you receive in rent probably pushes your breakeven point out by another 2 months. Goodbodys [broken link removed] houseprices to fall 8% next year after falling 5% this. I can't tell the future but I can tell when someone is making a loss today. If you have some further insight that allows you to gauge where the value of the asset will be at some point in the future then go for it.
Are any of these points relevant to the OPs scenario as has been described in the thread? The OP will not be receiving any S23 relief. Their return won't be 3% but -.45%Re the leverage I assumed my effective interest rate is less tax relief which leaves it at 3%odd which is less than bank deposit rates which to my mind makes it a no brainer to leverage into residential property with good rent roll? Couple this with section 23 etc umbrella from any tax liability this makes the property portfolio a rock solid long term investment but don't expect Goodbody to tell you this!
Inthe short term yes but over what 20 year period did property lose value?Speculating on the future of property prices can be done down the pub.
I never said it was. I said his return was -.45%. You said your return was 3%. Sorry for the confusion.Howitzer op's return is not 3% but his effective interest rate is less than bank deposit rates or inflation.
Inthe short term yes but over what 20 year period did property lose value?
Howitzer op's return is not 3% but his effective interest rate is less than bank deposit rates or inflation.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?