24hr petrol station "back in 15mins" 30 mins later no show! Claim consequential loss?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: 24hr petrol station "back in 15mins" 30 mins later no show! Claim consequential l

saintstephen said:
but allegations of drink driving etc I do not appreciate
Click to expand...

You said you were in no fit state to drive. Being under the influence of alcohol/drugs is one reason why a person would say they were in no fit state to drive.

rmelly was simply asking a question as to why you were in no fit state as you did not state your reason.
 
Re: 24hr petrol station "back in 15mins" 30 mins later no show! Claim consequential l


rmelly did not simply ask why he was in no fit state to drive. He said "Was he drunk or something? " A slight difference, would you not agree Smashbox?

I think that is a bit cheeky myself and wouldn't appreciate it!
 
Re: 24hr petrol station "back in 15mins" 30 mins later no show! Claim consequential l

Maggs065 said:
rmelly did not simply ask why he was in no fit state to drive. He said "Was he drunk or something? " A slight difference, would you not agree Smashbox?
Click to expand...

I didn't pick up any malice in the question, it was simply that, a question.

If someone said to me they were in no fit state to drive, personally I would think alcohol too.
 
Re: 24hr petrol station "back in 15mins" 30 mins later no show! Claim consequential l

Smashbox said:
If someone said to me they were in no fit state to drive, personally I would think alcohol too.
Click to expand...

It's the first thing I thought of also.
 
Re: 24hr petrol station "back in 15mins" 30 mins later no show! Claim consequential l


Good one.........
 
Re: 24hr petrol station "back in 15mins" 30 mins later no show! Claim consequential l

Originally Posted by Smashbox If someone said to me they were in no fit state to drive, personally I would think alcohol too.
Click to expand...

Caveat said:
It's the first thing I thought of also.
Click to expand...

As a turn of phrase yes... but surely not after reading such a phrase in context with the whole thread.
 
Re: 24hr petrol station "back in 15mins" 30 mins later no show! Claim consequential l

How would we know though?! I couldnt take that from what you have wrote.
 
Re: 24hr petrol station "back in 15mins" 30 mins later no show! Claim consequential l

Smashbox said:
How would we know though?! I couldnt take that from what you have wrote.
Click to expand...

Because I would have written that I was unable to drive due to being over the limit in my OP.
 
Re: 24hr petrol station "back in 15mins" 30 mins later no show! Claim consequential l

Why not say that you were in no fit state due to anger so? You didnt specify why you were in no fit state.
 
Re: 24hr petrol station "back in 15mins" 30 mins later no show! Claim consequential l

Sorry , I thought it would have been obvious in context with the thread.
 
Re: 24hr petrol station "back in 15mins" 30 mins later no show! Claim consequential l

Folks

This whole thread is ridiculous.

Carry on the discussion in Letting Off Steam.

Brendan
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Menu
Log in
Register