Brendan Burgess
Founder
- Messages
- 54,699
At the end Maura has paid in only 6% more than Mike, but she has a fund that is 12% bigger.
Mike may well have managed to buy a house 10 years earlier than Maura and may be far richer as a result.
You're forgetting a key factor - time. How early you start makes a difference!
Only to a point. Assume a 3% real return:
- Mike puts in €500 month from age 40 to 68.
- Maura puts in €50 a month from 22 to 39, then €500 a month from 40 to 68.
At the end Maura has paid in only 6% more than Mike, but she has a fund that is 12% bigger.
If you are on a low income and it is likely to stay low, a pension isn't much good to you
€50 a month in saving isn't going to advance the point at which you can buy a house by ten years! Maybe by a few months even.
Of course she does. But that's not the point I am making.
If you are on a low income and it is likely to stay low, a pension isn't much good to you. The tax relief is 20% if you get that at all and no access to the money until age 60. Better off saving the money. The State pension will make up a higher percentage of income than for a higher earner so you can probably live off that. Of course, the extension of the pension age to 68 makes it more complicated.
Steven
http://www.bluewaterfp.ie (www.bluewaterfp.ie)
So what are we basically saying here about low earners who can only contribute 50-100 euro a month to a pension? Don't bother? Because you only get 20% relief if even that and you pension pot will be tiny? Meanwhile high earners are told to fill their boots to get the maximum allowed relief. You have just made the Government's argument for pension reform right there.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?