Does anyone know what qualifactions/degrees/diplomas/adult education/certs/courses etc, that JOC holds?
Im really curious about this as I have heard that he said in an interview that he left school at 15.
There would of course would be two ways of looking at this..
One : He is a very bright ,intelligent person whom didnt need to attend school or uni,and is a natural born leader,whose experience throughout the years is/was enough of an education for him to do what he does and like many people his age ,left school at a very young age and went on to be very succesfull..OR
Two; He left school at 15 and didnt bother to further his education,who had at the very least as an adult an opportuinity to do so but didnt or wouldnt.Which in itself is not the brightest idea..
If its case one; I will be relieved.
If its case two; How come someone with no education/qualifactions etc gets to sit with a government elected by the people to govern and make decisions on our behalf when no one gave him a mandate to do so?Who couldnt be bothered to educate himself and who is talking strike action at every hands turn .
He has been a full time branch secretary since 1980.So he hasnt even had a proper job for 29 years!! Ah no ,I must be wrong,that couldnt be right...
If it is true,is it any wonder that he " leads" the way he does.
It goes without saying that there are many educated people in government who are making a mess of things without his help,but at least they were elected to do so.
Ill await the onslaught...
Thoughts anyone??
Im really curious about this as I have heard that he said in an interview that he left school at 15.
There would of course would be two ways of looking at this..
One : He is a very bright ,intelligent person whom didnt need to attend school or uni,and is a natural born leader,whose experience throughout the years is/was enough of an education for him to do what he does and like many people his age ,left school at a very young age and went on to be very succesfull..OR
Two; He left school at 15 and didnt bother to further his education,who had at the very least as an adult an opportuinity to do so but didnt or wouldnt.Which in itself is not the brightest idea..
If its case one; I will be relieved.
If its case two; How come someone with no education/qualifactions etc gets to sit with a government elected by the people to govern and make decisions on our behalf when no one gave him a mandate to do so?Who couldnt be bothered to educate himself and who is talking strike action at every hands turn .
He has been a full time branch secretary since 1980.So he hasnt even had a proper job for 29 years!! Ah no ,I must be wrong,that couldnt be right...
If it is true,is it any wonder that he " leads" the way he does.
It goes without saying that there are many educated people in government who are making a mess of things without his help,but at least they were elected to do so.
Ill await the onslaught...
Thoughts anyone??
Last edited: