It seems to me that the Legal Profession have quite a few questions to answer with regards to their conduct during this Commission.
2 questions posed by Michael O'Brien on Q&A.
Why were 7 Barristers present during his hearing?
Why was a confrontational stance taken when the brief seems to have been, explicitly, non-confrontational?
Presumably 7 barristers were present to represent each individual Religous group. But it would have been quite obvious beforehand that each indivual case would only present issues against 1, 2 or maybe 3 at most.
2 questions posed by Michael O'Brien on Q&A.
Why were 7 Barristers present during his hearing?
Why was a confrontational stance taken when the brief seems to have been, explicitly, non-confrontational?
Presumably 7 barristers were present to represent each individual Religous group. But it would have been quite obvious beforehand that each indivual case would only present issues against 1, 2 or maybe 3 at most.