Alan Shatter's campaign to abolish Inheritance Tax

So everyone should only pay whatever taxes they feel like, according to their personal moral code, is that what you're suggesting?
In your scenario you are forcing your view on me I am not forcing mine on you. I am keeping this specifically on the topic of this thread inheritance tax before you take this down a rabbit hole.

If you believe the limits are wrong you don't have to accept them. You can always gift money to the State rather than avail of thresholds.

What you are proposing is removing my choice. I am not removing your choice.

If I have worked for, sacrificed for to accumulate modest wealth to provide me with peace of mind in my old age then I don't agree with being punished for doing so.

Before you say I am not being punished it is the receiptent who is being affected then I disagree as my assets are being taxed and my wishes are not been honoured.
 
You can say that about any tax. Why should my income which I earned through blood, sweat, and tears incur income taxes and usc ? I worked hard at university and to pass my professional exams and now work hard in work and earn that money so why should it be taxed ?

And once you die your assets are no longer yours. They are now the recipients. And they will be taxed over thresholds. And the law is that your will should be followed and your wishes honoured. What people forget is that the act of gifting to someone can result in a tax being due, so in reality, leaving something other than cash the recipient might need to sell it to pay the tax. If you want your wishes to be that the recipient gets something like a home without it having to be sold, you will need to account for that in your planning to ensure you also leave enough cash or take out a policy to pay the tax due.
 
But nothing for uncle/aunt niece/nephew relationships.

We even had to have the nonsense of some lad marrying his uncle to avoid a big tax hit on the latter's death.
Illegal to marry your uncle and many types of other relationships like this. I am sure it is within the remit of both Revenue and the GRO to investigate marriages that are not genuine. And with marriage comes responsibility which we often see played out on the forums here.


 
Yes I was thinking of this case. I can't comment in the bona fides of their relationship. But if they were this public I hope it was investigated.
I think that it was discussed at the time here, in other forums and in the media and, as far as I recall, nobody such as Revenue poked their noses into their business.

Edit:
 
I think that it was discussed at the time here, in other forums and in the media and, as far as I recall, nobody such as Revenue poked their noses into their business.
Or they did an assessment and came to the conclusion that the marriage was genuine and the tax exemption stood. Which I would expect to be a private matter between the recipient and Revenue ?
 
Or they did an assessment and came to the conclusion that the marriage was genuine and the tax exemption stood. Which I would expect to be a private matter between the recipient and Revenue ?
No - I updated my post. Revenue made a public statement on the issue (which surprised me).
 
No - I updated my post. Revenue made a public statement on the issue (which surprised me).
Sorry I see that now. Neither agency taking responsibility! So Revenue accept a marriage that had been accepted as valid by the GRO/Gardai. A very edge case as well. And yes very surprised that they made a public statement.
 
Sorry I see that now. Neither agency taking responsibility! So Revenue accept a marriage that had been accepted as valid by the GRO/Gardai. A very edge case as well. And yes very surprised that they made a public statement.
I have a vague recollection of there being subsequent similar cases but maybe I'm mistaken?
And then there are probably some people who do this but don't publicise it.
 
Sorry I see that now. Neither agency taking responsibility! So Revenue accept a marriage that had been accepted as valid by the GRO/Gardai. A very edge case as well.

I have a vague recollection of there being subsequent similar cases but maybe I'm mistaken?
And then there are probably some people who do this but don't publicise it.
It costs 200 euro and gives many tax advantages. Def worth doing in some circumstances.
 
Back
Top