And eventually Call Centres and even more people in the Financial Services and Insurance sectors.It'll probably put the essay factories for students in India our of business
The "audit trail"!. I remember the e voting machine issues for example and yet, the chances are they were more accurate then someone reading hundreds of ballots in an hour. There is an element here of humans not accepting the machine may be more efficient and effective. But then, we once thought the universe revolved around the earth.I think any artifact produced by an automated process would still need to be reviewed by a human for accuracy, legal issues, context etc....
Lack of oversight breeds the spread of misinformation, just like social media. So, more AI will require more human oversight.
ChatGPT for instance doesn't cite any sources for its 'information'.
In the words of Father Ted - 'careful now'
You are probably what was called in my day a Humanities man where I was a Science man.@Duke of Marmalade, what this shows, and what I already knew, is that I'm not very good at the auld sums.
So I'm not smart enough to be replaced by a robot. That's a relief!You are probably what was called in my day a Humanities man where I was a Science man.
AI may one day win a Noble prize for science, though my dealings with ChatGPT suggest that this will not be in my lifetime.
One thing for sure, AI will never win a Nobel prize for literature.
Science/mathematics stands apart from the human mind/emotions whereas Humanities/literature is the opposite. Discuss.
Possibly, but then would we also start believing 2=2=7. After all, some people think Trump won the last election in the USIf everyone told Chatgbt that 2+2 = 7 would it then give that as the answer to the question what is 2 + 2?