I'd like to voice my support for this survey, with the caveat that the results should be published and sent to the ILS, IPI, RIAI and CIF [Solicitors, Planners, Architects and Builders] together with all the planning authorities in the country.
For years Management companies where the means whereby the responsibility of looking after private apartment schemes/"gated communities" were shouldered by developers.
Several problems arose to to the lack of definition of what are termed "the common areas" in schemes [particularly internal common rooms, meeting spaces etc.].
Originally these were touted as "necessary" for establishing a good community spirit but with nobody maintaining them the result was that these got neglected and later schemes were not required to include them, yet some early schemes may still have them.
Far more important is the requirement to keep the fire safety measures maintained to their commission requirements.
This includes fire detection and alarm systems and in particular the fire doors, which seem to take the brunt of late night revellers returning home.
Anecdotal horror stories abound with tales of management company's agents whose fees are so high they end up stripping the sinking fund.
Other stories exist of management companies which have been taken over show members decide to reduce the annual contribution to the sinking fund.
Such companies will not be able to afford the 20-year replacement cost of services, including lifts, which most apartment blocks possess and depend on for their ease of access particularly for disabled or elderly occupants.
The problem is that most people aren't interested in giving of their time to administrate the company of which they are a member.
They then seek "management agents" to do their work for them, and they get fleeced.
Or they seek a short term reduction in outlay and are storing up problems for the future.
To be blunt about it, you *do* get what you pay for, and if you're going to pay a pen pusher to deal with people-problems and building-problems, you'll pay through the nose.
It would be very useful if the survey could discover what solutions work best and publish them, taking all factors into account.
Perhaps a little outside-the-box thinking might be just the ticket.
ONQ.