Good opinion piece in the Sunday Times

Brendan Burgess

Founder
Messages
52,179
By Niall Brady

Negative response


Mortgage customers of Permanent TSB took their campaign for a fairer deal to the Dail last week — only for the government to treat them with the same disdain as the lame-duck bank under its control.


PTSB expects some customers to pay for its past mistakes by charging them a variable interest rate of 5.19%. This subsidises the loss-making tracker mortgages that it has given two out of every three mortgage customers, with an average rate of just 2.25%.


Forcing a minority to subsidise the majority clearly violates the consumer protection code, which requires banks to act fairly in the best interests of all customers. Trackers are a problem for all lenders but, apart from PTSB, none of them has passed the bill to customers on variable rates.


These issues did not seem to trouble Brian Hayes, minister of state for public service reform, when he told the Dail on Tuesday that mortgage pricing was a matter for the banks to decide.


If this is so, why did the government force Allied Irish Banks (AIB) to cut rates last October, even though its mortgages were already the cheapest? Why was similar pressure placed on Bank of Ireland and Ulster Bank — but not PTSB?


Hayes reminded PTSB’s customers that they had benefited from a big rate cut in December, but seemed to forget that they pay substantially more than customers of other lenders, despite the reduction. PTSB’s current rate of 5.19%, for example, compares with 3% at AIB, 3.84% at Bank of Ireland and 4.75% at Ulster Bank. The British government is clearly a kinder paymaster.


The government’s defence of PTSB descended into farce on Wednesday when no ministers or TDs from the ruling coalition bothered to turn up as the mortgage debate resumed.


In the face of such indifference, PTSB’s customers are powerless. They cannot move elsewhere if they are in negative equity. Even those whose homes are worth more than their mortgages are trapped because more competitive lenders accept only the most creditworthy applicants. To rub salt in the wounds, PTSB is advertising variable mortgages at 3.69% — but for new customers only.


Government sources hint that the solution lies in ridding PTSB of its troublesome trackers, so the bank would have no excuse for robbing Peter to pay Paul. Customers will believe it when they see it.
 
By Niall Brady
Forcing a minority to subsidise the majority clearly violates the consumer protection code, which requires banks to act fairly in the best interests of all customers. Trackers are a problem for all lenders but, apart from PTSB, none of them has passed the bill to customers on variable rates.

Whatever about those on variable rates, aren't all tax payers also paying. And is it not better than the PTSB gets back on it's feet as quickly as possible so that we taxpayers pay less.

Maybe the issue should be why is AIB and BofI variable rate customers not paying more.
 
Whatever about those on variable rates, aren't all tax payers also paying. And is it not better than the PTSB gets back on it's feet as quickly as possible so that we taxpayers pay less.

Maybe the issue should be why is AIB and BofI variable rate customers not paying more.

Because the government won't allow AIB (and presumably BOI) to run their own ships and charge what interest rates they want but PTSB can charge exorbitant rates without fear of reprisal
 
Whatever about those on variable rates, aren't all tax payers also paying.

Yes, we are. So someone who is on a PTSB variable rate and is also a tax payer is paying on the double which is simply not sustainable!
 
I don't have a PTSB mortgage but I have a tracker with Halifax.

Does Niall Brady really wish to see trackers removed from mortgage holders?


Marion
 
No Marion, that is not what he is saying at all. He's talking about the trackers being removed as a burden from both AIB and PTSB to another 'bank' which is currently rumoured to be the former Anglo, IBRC. Customers will not lose their tracker mortgage agreements, they will remain in place.

However, the balance sheets of AIB and PTSB will look much healthier when those loss making mortgages are no longer on their books which will eventually make them more attractive to buyers when the Government looks to offload their shareholding in those banks, thus separating Government affairs from banking affairs, as it should be!
 
Back
Top