This is a long story ...
My mother was with Smart for voice only services. When they unexpectedly went out of this business customers such as herself were forced to switch. Comreg issued warnings/info and put in place a temporary voice calls service. If I recall correctly customers were supposed to switch before Friday October 27th (with the possibility that this deadline was extended further) and the temporary service was in place until Friday November 10th.
My mother signed up with UTV for voice and broadband services on 18th October and they confirmed that her account was up and running on 26th October. She received her router and her broadband worked. Her voice calls were still being routed via the Comreg temporary service.
On 10th November the temporary service ceased and she could no longer make or receive calls. Her broadband was still working but stopped soon after. Effectively her line was dead. UTV never contacted her to inform her that there was any problem with the line transfer but on contacting them they said that the transfer request (to eircom) failed because they rejected the UAN (Universal Account Number) even though it was correct. UTV said that they could do nothing and that the problem lay with eircom.
When contacted eircom said that they could do nothing and UTV had to contact their wholesale department to sort out the OLO (Other Licensed Operator) issues with the line. UTV said that they had tried this without success. eircom's wholesale department won't deal with the general public. Basically the two operators disclaimed responsibility and blamed the other.
So we contacted Comreg who told us to exhaust each operator's complaints process. So we did. eircom didn't respond within the 10 days in which they are supposed to but when they did they just told us the same story. I must have rung UTV about 20 times at this stage and got the same story (the opposite to eircom's) from them. They have not responded to the official complaint that I emailed to them but I have never received any substantive response to any emailed query in the past so I don't hold out much hope. Comreg have the complaint reference numbers but just seem to note everything down and do nothing.
In the meantime UTV charged her the first and second months' broadband fee (€9.99 x 2) and also a contract breakage penalty (€59.99) on the basis that the loss of her line means that she has terminated the agreement prematurely! An attempt to reactivate/reorder the line from eircom was refused on the basis that they cannot do anything until the other operator sorts things out. Real pillar to post stuff.
So we got onto Comreg again and in spite of them purportedly having a consumer protection role in all of this they basically tell us that they can do nothing. Advice from them included getting legal advice on the matter and contacting BT instead because they have a "special team" to deal with this sort of thing. It seems to me that as a consumer protection agency in the telecoms market Comreg are a waste of space.
In the heel of the reel my mother, who happens to be a 75 year old widow living alone, is - through no fault of her own - left without any landline, no prospect of getting it restored/replaced and none of the players involved (the two operators or Comreg) seem willing or able to do anything constructive about this. Crazy and all as it seems we have now resorted to contacting local elected representatives (including the main man since she's in Dublin Central!) since there seems to be no other obvious route to solving this problem.
Anybody else got any other suggestions? She has a mobile for emergencies but it is not a cost effective solution. Neither is getting in non landline broadband and using VoIP. Basically we want to restore/replace her existing landline and get her back to where she was but it seems to be impossible!
My mother was with Smart for voice only services. When they unexpectedly went out of this business customers such as herself were forced to switch. Comreg issued warnings/info and put in place a temporary voice calls service. If I recall correctly customers were supposed to switch before Friday October 27th (with the possibility that this deadline was extended further) and the temporary service was in place until Friday November 10th.
My mother signed up with UTV for voice and broadband services on 18th October and they confirmed that her account was up and running on 26th October. She received her router and her broadband worked. Her voice calls were still being routed via the Comreg temporary service.
On 10th November the temporary service ceased and she could no longer make or receive calls. Her broadband was still working but stopped soon after. Effectively her line was dead. UTV never contacted her to inform her that there was any problem with the line transfer but on contacting them they said that the transfer request (to eircom) failed because they rejected the UAN (Universal Account Number) even though it was correct. UTV said that they could do nothing and that the problem lay with eircom.
When contacted eircom said that they could do nothing and UTV had to contact their wholesale department to sort out the OLO (Other Licensed Operator) issues with the line. UTV said that they had tried this without success. eircom's wholesale department won't deal with the general public. Basically the two operators disclaimed responsibility and blamed the other.
So we contacted Comreg who told us to exhaust each operator's complaints process. So we did. eircom didn't respond within the 10 days in which they are supposed to but when they did they just told us the same story. I must have rung UTV about 20 times at this stage and got the same story (the opposite to eircom's) from them. They have not responded to the official complaint that I emailed to them but I have never received any substantive response to any emailed query in the past so I don't hold out much hope. Comreg have the complaint reference numbers but just seem to note everything down and do nothing.
In the meantime UTV charged her the first and second months' broadband fee (€9.99 x 2) and also a contract breakage penalty (€59.99) on the basis that the loss of her line means that she has terminated the agreement prematurely! An attempt to reactivate/reorder the line from eircom was refused on the basis that they cannot do anything until the other operator sorts things out. Real pillar to post stuff.
So we got onto Comreg again and in spite of them purportedly having a consumer protection role in all of this they basically tell us that they can do nothing. Advice from them included getting legal advice on the matter and contacting BT instead because they have a "special team" to deal with this sort of thing. It seems to me that as a consumer protection agency in the telecoms market Comreg are a waste of space.
In the heel of the reel my mother, who happens to be a 75 year old widow living alone, is - through no fault of her own - left without any landline, no prospect of getting it restored/replaced and none of the players involved (the two operators or Comreg) seem willing or able to do anything constructive about this. Crazy and all as it seems we have now resorted to contacting local elected representatives (including the main man since she's in Dublin Central!) since there seems to be no other obvious route to solving this problem.
Anybody else got any other suggestions? She has a mobile for emergencies but it is not a cost effective solution. Neither is getting in non landline broadband and using VoIP. Basically we want to restore/replace her existing landline and get her back to where she was but it seems to be impossible!