People seem to have different opinions regarding how much property prices will drop as and when this bubble bursts.
I'd like to get people's opinions on what a sustainable relationship between rental yields and capital costs of properties, which should give an idea of how much of a fall is to be expected (excluding any overshoots).
Current yields are 1%-3.5%.
This is based on rents which are high in real terms.
In real terms I believe that rents will fall, going forward:
There is additional housing stock coming on stream, which will increase supply (as well as those currently uninhabited 240k houses discovered by the Census).
There is currently an economic boom - which means, relatively speaking, a high demand for property and wages are high.
A downturn would mean that economic migrants would leave and further dampen demand.
Rents in Ireland are high relative to wages when compared internationally, taking about 25% of take-home pay. (Though this is not a reason that they should drop, it does give a perspective on the expense of renting in Ireland at present).
Now, should yields be as high as 10% - as I believe someone on the Current Sentiments thread said was mentioned by an American Property Ladder program?
The general wisdom on this website seems to be that yields should be above bank interest rates:
But I wonder if this is necessarily true - since rents and therefore yields are a function of the state of the economy and wage inflation, … As such can the security offered by property that the rental yield will match inflation compensate for a lower return?
(For example, as Walk2dewater suggests that there may be a period of inflation in the coming years, is property not a better place to weather the storm than a bank account?)
Alternatively, some people suggest that 2001 was when property prices last reflected fundamentals - this being the last time that normal interest rates applied.
But since then -
A. there has been a massive increase in housing supply.
B. A recession in elements of the economy not reliant on the low interest rate fuelled construction boom.
So as the bubble bursts, wouldn’t rents in real terms not be lower, thus meaning that property prices will in real terms be lower than in 2001?
Comments and insights welcome.
I'd like to get people's opinions on what a sustainable relationship between rental yields and capital costs of properties, which should give an idea of how much of a fall is to be expected (excluding any overshoots).
Current yields are 1%-3.5%.
This is based on rents which are high in real terms.
In real terms I believe that rents will fall, going forward:
There is additional housing stock coming on stream, which will increase supply (as well as those currently uninhabited 240k houses discovered by the Census).
There is currently an economic boom - which means, relatively speaking, a high demand for property and wages are high.
A downturn would mean that economic migrants would leave and further dampen demand.
Rents in Ireland are high relative to wages when compared internationally, taking about 25% of take-home pay. (Though this is not a reason that they should drop, it does give a perspective on the expense of renting in Ireland at present).
Now, should yields be as high as 10% - as I believe someone on the Current Sentiments thread said was mentioned by an American Property Ladder program?
The general wisdom on this website seems to be that yields should be above bank interest rates:
But I wonder if this is necessarily true - since rents and therefore yields are a function of the state of the economy and wage inflation, … As such can the security offered by property that the rental yield will match inflation compensate for a lower return?
(For example, as Walk2dewater suggests that there may be a period of inflation in the coming years, is property not a better place to weather the storm than a bank account?)
Alternatively, some people suggest that 2001 was when property prices last reflected fundamentals - this being the last time that normal interest rates applied.
But since then -
A. there has been a massive increase in housing supply.
B. A recession in elements of the economy not reliant on the low interest rate fuelled construction boom.
So as the bubble bursts, wouldn’t rents in real terms not be lower, thus meaning that property prices will in real terms be lower than in 2001?
Comments and insights welcome.