D
Dre2002
Guest
I moved into my semi end terraced home about 3 mnths ago and have recently got a sky dish. I have now received a letter from the Builders requesting its removal and if not removed they shall seek legal advise. They sent a copy of the section in the contract mentioning that the lessor should not erect any aerials, cables or dishes on or at the block.
About 5 questions before and 5 questions after are directed to apartments and there is no mention of a house in these statements.
I also noticed in a previous posting the below..
([broken link removed]?
reference=SPEECH/01/336&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en
"....According to this communication,users should be free to use satellite dishes without undue technical,administrative,urban planning or tax obstacles."
My argument is 1) under contract law would the fact that block was mentioned an not a house deem this to be an ambiguous reference? sounds to me like the reference is made to apartments
2) should this not be an issue that the owner of the mortgage (bank) or residents take up as the builders have sold the property and has nothing to do with them.
The thing that gets me is the builders have supposedly a commission based agreement with another cable provider which I refused to get due to bad customer service and was informed at first that they were not providing the estate with the cable service....
I just dont understand why builders should have any sort of say in the social entertainment of the occupiers of a house....where is the logic??
Where do I stand and where do the builders stand?
Thx,
Dre2002
About 5 questions before and 5 questions after are directed to apartments and there is no mention of a house in these statements.
I also noticed in a previous posting the below..
([broken link removed]?
reference=SPEECH/01/336&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en
"....According to this communication,users should be free to use satellite dishes without undue technical,administrative,urban planning or tax obstacles."
My argument is 1) under contract law would the fact that block was mentioned an not a house deem this to be an ambiguous reference? sounds to me like the reference is made to apartments
2) should this not be an issue that the owner of the mortgage (bank) or residents take up as the builders have sold the property and has nothing to do with them.
The thing that gets me is the builders have supposedly a commission based agreement with another cable provider which I refused to get due to bad customer service and was informed at first that they were not providing the estate with the cable service....
I just dont understand why builders should have any sort of say in the social entertainment of the occupiers of a house....where is the logic??
Where do I stand and where do the builders stand?
Thx,
Dre2002