I'd agree with you Dr. M, mainly because i'm fed up with the
Indo fullstop, but also for your stated reasons. A quick analysis of the article suggests to me:
1) Its meerly a re-hashing of information published in more reputable places - it tells nothing new (althought re-hashing information is what newspapers do.)
2) The language... ranges from a few excellent sentences (
"Separately, the European Commission has published proposals for the harmonisation of the European corporate tax base, effectively standardising the way tax is calculated across the EU")... to awkward colloquial terminology (
"we were still the men from the bog who desperately needed a fresh "leg up"...The Germans won't leave it alone...They will keep coming after us on this issue...The Americans are big boys")
3) The choice of words/adjectives follows the
Indos new style guide - sensational and tabloid -
"desperately...massive...fantastic...massive [again]....biggest...richest...richest [again]...."
4) Some of the comments are bias and undoubtably off the point -
"richest economy in the world, which spends $1bn per day on defence."
5) Some of the comments/"facts" are misleading/questionable -
"the richest economy in the world" - true in absolute terms... but in fairer measures - per capita GDP/GNP etc., it's not.
...Eastern Europe are already offering Corporation Tax deals that are lower than ours. - again very misleading,
we still have the lowest corporation tax in Europe - yes the author uses the term "deals" - but the IDA have been offering "deals" for years ranging from paying for capital investment (factories) to training costs.
DrMoriarty said:
If it was a Leaving Cert/1st year undergraduate essay, I'd fail it purely on grounds of incoherence/mixed metaphors/generally poor style/lack of meaningful content.
As you may know, i'm a LC student and I agree fully with you on this - I assure you if I were to show this to my teacher he would tear it apart in an instant.