Hate to rain on anyone's parade, but is this entirely a good thing? Is it not a good thing that a potential house purchaser should be able to show some capacity to save some kind of a deposit or have other assests equivalent to same, not necessarily 10% or the house price?
I know a couple, mid/ late twenties who have dreams of building/ buying a house. Not just any old house, they want a big house with all the trimmings...but they haven't a bean! Not because they don't earn decent salaries but more because they have no idea what it's like to save for the things you want/ need in life. They eat out regularly, weekends start on Thursday night and finish on Sunday night, lifes one long party and they don't want it to stop. I'm 33 married, one child and have been a "homeowner" for 6 years, but it wasn't easy, both my wife and I were low to average earners at the start of the boom so it wasn't easy to pull the money together to buy a home. And when we did bite the bullet it took a couple of years to feel comfortable with the level of debt/ repayments etc. Maybe I'm just getting old but I think this might fuel further inflation in the house market. At the end of the day people are quite happy to tell their bank/ broker whatever they want to hear when it comes to securing credit. Just because you earn a certain salary doesn't of itself indicate a capacity to repay.....Maybe this should be in LOS. What do you think?