Liam,
Self-directed doesn't have to mean no advice. In fact, in my view, occupational pension transfers should always be required to be advised given the various risks presented. To be clear I would welcome legislation/regulation to prevent execution only occupational pension transfers (in the UK this has always been considered high risk business and required a much higher level of adviser competence and additional examinations)
This question is one currently being addressed by the retail distribution review in the UK - why should a client pay for advice that they are not receiving? I recently met a client who had been flogged a self-directed pension and the broker had pocketed €40,000 commission for arranging the contract - no ongoing service, no ongoing advice, no portfolio assistance just taking the application form to the insurance company and get this, the contact wasn't even fit for the purpose the client required and so now the client has had to pay the early surrender penalty and arrange a new contract at his own expense.
My point is that since an adviser could offer an advisory contract for the same price as the Irish life contract (I.e 0.75%pa which includes an ongoing service fee of 0.5%pa which is agreed with and disclosed to the client) how can a broker justify selling a contract with no advice for the same price if, as you say, the client is getting "nothing" for it?
I'm not offering a no advice contract because I believe that competent advice is always worth paying for since it pays for itself, my point is that "brokers" are going to find it increasing difficult to simply arrange contracts with no advice, no service and no responsibility when things go wrong, for the same price as an advisory contract with a fee for ongoing service built in.
To the broker community get ready for RDR in Ireland it's going to come and "brokers" will need to become "advisers" in order to survive.