Brendan Burgess
Founder
- Messages
- 54,423
I made a formal complaint to the Central Bank about the way in which Bespoke Investments advertised and promoted the [broken link removed]The Central Bank does not give complainants feedback on their complaints, whether they are justified or not, or even whether or not, they have investigated them. But as the brochure has been changed, I assume that the Central Bank told them to change it. Of course, the Central Bank may have ignored my complaint and the company may have just changed the brochure anyway to reflect the analysis on Askaboutmoney
My complaint had three grounds
1) It is a misrepresentation and clearly in breach of the CPC to describe the charges as 0%
2) It is unfair in highlighting in the ad the figure of 6% deposit interest as that is payable only on a small part of the investment
3) The whole sales pitch of the brochure is completely over the top and likely to induce vulnerable consumers to invest in a bond which they can’t be expected to understand
Bespoke Investments replaced an ad on the front page of the Makets Section of the Sunday Business Post with an ad for their Trustee Services. This is very odd given that the bond closes on 31 March and they should be highlighting this product. I am guessing that the Central Bank told them to withdraw the ad as it was misleading - point 2) above.
Bespoke Investments has also changed the brochure.
They have removed the prominent reference to 6% on the front.
They have also changed the following text:
"0% will be used to secure the cash bonus which may be payable after 3 years 9 months
0% will be taken in charges".
It now reads
"3.34% will be used to secure the cash bonus which may be payable after 3 years 9 months
5.57% will be taken in charges"
This is hugely significant. They had been claiming that there was no charges on this product which I was astonished by.
But also the 3.34% allows us to see what lousy value this product really is.
They have not changed the sales pitch of the brochure, but I suppose 2 out of three aint bad.
I have made many complaints to the Financial Regualtor about the BCP Quadruple Growth Bond and they seemed to fall on deaf ears, so it's great to see a bit of action at last.
Brendan
My complaint had three grounds
1) It is a misrepresentation and clearly in breach of the CPC to describe the charges as 0%
2) It is unfair in highlighting in the ad the figure of 6% deposit interest as that is payable only on a small part of the investment
3) The whole sales pitch of the brochure is completely over the top and likely to induce vulnerable consumers to invest in a bond which they can’t be expected to understand
Bespoke Investments replaced an ad on the front page of the Makets Section of the Sunday Business Post with an ad for their Trustee Services. This is very odd given that the bond closes on 31 March and they should be highlighting this product. I am guessing that the Central Bank told them to withdraw the ad as it was misleading - point 2) above.
Bespoke Investments has also changed the brochure.
They have removed the prominent reference to 6% on the front.
They have also changed the following text:
"0% will be used to secure the cash bonus which may be payable after 3 years 9 months
0% will be taken in charges".
It now reads
"3.34% will be used to secure the cash bonus which may be payable after 3 years 9 months
5.57% will be taken in charges"
This is hugely significant. They had been claiming that there was no charges on this product which I was astonished by.
But also the 3.34% allows us to see what lousy value this product really is.
They have not changed the sales pitch of the brochure, but I suppose 2 out of three aint bad.
I have made many complaints to the Financial Regualtor about the BCP Quadruple Growth Bond and they seemed to fall on deaf ears, so it's great to see a bit of action at last.
Brendan