That was the headline this morning on the radio, and I waited, and waited, and waited for the correction. It did not materialise.
Here is a snip from an email I sent to the European Consumer Centre asking for clarification on their press release and interview on Morning Ireland.
"I heard with amazement this morning that one third of goods ordered online in the EU are not delivered. This was the opening of the interview on Morning Ireland. I awaited a correction, but it did not materialise, altough I did sense from the interviewee that in fact the "one third" phrase referred to one third of cases/complaints handled by ECC related to non-delivery.
I heard a similarly misleading opening statement on the Ryan Tubridy show, but did not get a chance to hear the piece in full.
I had a look at your press release this morning and indeed your fine report, and I have reached the same conclusion I reached after listening to the piece on Morning Ireland. It would appear that one third of cases/complaints handled by ECC relate to non-delivery, but it is not correct to extrapolate this to conclude that one third of all goods ordered online are not delivered, because account is not taken of the number of online orders for which case/complaint are not referred to yourselves (which I can only assume are positive experiences for the most part).
If my reading of your data is correct, then the headline quoted on your website and on the radio media this morning is misleading. A logical interpretation of the headline would be that of the 318,000 consumers shopping online in 2005, over 100,000 of them had experienced a failure to deliver. Clearly that is a shock statistic, and I don't believe it for a minute.
Instead of the headline "1 in 3 goods fail to arrive when shopping online" would it not be correct to say "1 in 3 complaints re: shopping online relate to delivery failure".
I am amazed that none of the media organisations that carried the story picked up on this.
Can you confirm that my understanding of the data in your report is correct and that we do not have a 33% failure rate when ordering online.
I should say that I have no affiliation to any online businesses, but I do work in the IT industry. My interest here is as an interested shopper, rather than as a worried trader."
(end quote)
If anyone is interested in looking at this, the press release and report are here ...
[broken link removed]
I await clarification from ECC, but if my take is correct, I can't believe such a shock (and misleading) statistic was left stand. Just in case I don't get a response from ECC, I would be curious to hear if anyone heard the statistic being clarified/questioned/corrected in any other media outlets.
Here is a snip from an email I sent to the European Consumer Centre asking for clarification on their press release and interview on Morning Ireland.
"I heard with amazement this morning that one third of goods ordered online in the EU are not delivered. This was the opening of the interview on Morning Ireland. I awaited a correction, but it did not materialise, altough I did sense from the interviewee that in fact the "one third" phrase referred to one third of cases/complaints handled by ECC related to non-delivery.
I heard a similarly misleading opening statement on the Ryan Tubridy show, but did not get a chance to hear the piece in full.
I had a look at your press release this morning and indeed your fine report, and I have reached the same conclusion I reached after listening to the piece on Morning Ireland. It would appear that one third of cases/complaints handled by ECC relate to non-delivery, but it is not correct to extrapolate this to conclude that one third of all goods ordered online are not delivered, because account is not taken of the number of online orders for which case/complaint are not referred to yourselves (which I can only assume are positive experiences for the most part).
If my reading of your data is correct, then the headline quoted on your website and on the radio media this morning is misleading. A logical interpretation of the headline would be that of the 318,000 consumers shopping online in 2005, over 100,000 of them had experienced a failure to deliver. Clearly that is a shock statistic, and I don't believe it for a minute.
Instead of the headline "1 in 3 goods fail to arrive when shopping online" would it not be correct to say "1 in 3 complaints re: shopping online relate to delivery failure".
I am amazed that none of the media organisations that carried the story picked up on this.
Can you confirm that my understanding of the data in your report is correct and that we do not have a 33% failure rate when ordering online.
I should say that I have no affiliation to any online businesses, but I do work in the IT industry. My interest here is as an interested shopper, rather than as a worried trader."
(end quote)
If anyone is interested in looking at this, the press release and report are here ...
[broken link removed]
I await clarification from ECC, but if my take is correct, I can't believe such a shock (and misleading) statistic was left stand. Just in case I don't get a response from ECC, I would be curious to hear if anyone heard the statistic being clarified/questioned/corrected in any other media outlets.
Last edited: